Objective Comparing the efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilatation and endoscopic stricteroto-my for postoperative anastomotic stenosis of colorectal cancer. Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with postoperative anastomotic stenosis of colorectal cancer that underwent anastomotic dilatation from 2013 to 2016,and analyzed the anastomotic stenosis before and after treatment,and compared the efficacy of the two groups of dilatation methods. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in baseline characteristics. Balloon dilatation was effective in 3 cases(23.1%),ineffective in 10 cases(76.9%). 7 cases(63.6%)were effective in the stricterotomy group,4 cases(36.4%)were ineffective,the difference was statistically significant(P=0.045).Two groups of patients were not bleeding after surgery,infection and perfora-tion and other complications. Conclusion Endoscopic stricterotomy of postoperative anastomotic stenosis of colorectal cancer is more effective than conventional endoscopic balloon dilatation%目的 对比结直肠癌术后吻合口狭窄内镜下球囊扩张术与内镜下切开扩张术的疗效.方法 回顾性分析2013-2016年间于中山大学附属第六医院行内镜下吻合口球囊扩张或切开扩张的结直肠癌术后吻合口狭窄患者的临床资料,统计治疗前后吻合口狭窄情况,对比两种扩张方式的治疗效果.结果 两组在性别、年龄、原发部位、吻合口位置、吻合口大小之间的差异没有统计学意义;球囊扩张组有效3例(23.1%),无效10例(76.9%),狭窄切开组有效7例(63.6%),无效4例(36.4%),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.045);两组患者术后均未出现出血、感染及穿孔等并发症.结论 内镜下狭窄切开术治疗结直肠癌术后吻合口狭窄较传统内镜下球囊扩张有效率更高.
展开▼
