《人民陪审员法》第二十二条以探索性或实验性立法的方式,规定了人民陪审员只参与事实审机制,明确在七人合议庭中实行法官与人民陪审员分职分权,有利于促进人民陪审员实质性参审.但在人民陪审员只参与事实审机制实践中,仍面临事实审与法律审如何准确区分、适用范围如何科学确定、法官如何有效指引人民陪审员等问题,可以通过建立区分规则和程序,严格限制适用案件范围,强化法官对人民陪审员的指引责任等予以完善.%The article 22of the People's Assessors Law,in the form of exploratory or experimental legislation, stipulates that the People's assessors shall only participate in the fact review mechanism,it clearly defines the respective powers of judges and People's assessors in the seven-person collegiate bench,and promotes the substantive participation of the people's assessors.However,there are still many problems of the mechanism in practice,such as how to accurately distinguish between the fact trial and the law trial, how to scientifically determine the scope of application,how to effectively guide the people's assessors and so on.It can be improved by establishing distinction rules and procedures,strictly limiting the scope of applicable cases,and strengthening the judges'responsibility for guiding people's assessors.
展开▼
