Reviewing the development history of western public goods theory, it can be seen that the study of public goods originates from the concept itself to the controversy on the public goods supply mode, and extends to the controversy of supply mode of public product and extend to the theoretical speculation and practical exploration of public goods supply efficiency and supervision effectiveness. Whether it is government monopoly supply mode in view of market failure, dual supply mode of government and market which is based on government failure, or multi-interactive supply mode which gives consideration to market and government failure. The selection of public goods supplier is obviously a passive selection process to re-search and re-try the supplier when the original one causes failure namely efficiency loss, thus the social welfare loss is self-evident. Therefore, reshaping the relationship between government and market, clearing the selection criteria of public goods supplier, strengthening and improving the supervision policies of the supplier and promoting the public goods supply efficiency and supervision quality deserve attention, which are also the further research emphases of public goods theory and government supervision reform.%回顾西方公共产品理论发展历程可见，对公共产品的研究，始于公共产品概念本身，发展到对公共产品供给模式的争论，延伸至围绕公共产品供给效率和监管效果展开的理论思辨与实践探索。不论是基于市场失灵考量的公共产品政府垄断供给模式，还是基于政府失灵考量的公共产品政府与市场的二元供给模式，亦或兼顾政府失灵和市场失灵建立的公共产品多元互动供给模式。显然，公共产品供给主体的选择，是一个当原有供给主体产生失灵问题即效率损失之后再对供给主体重新寻找和尝试的被动选择过程，因而造成的社会福利损失不言自明。因此，重塑政府与市场的关系，明确公共产品供给主体的选择标准，强化和完善对供给主体的监管政策，提升公共产品供给效率和监管质量，便成为题中应有之意，也是公共产品理论和政府监管改革下一步研究重点。
展开▼
