残疾人体育竞赛纠纷的特殊性决定了其纠纷解决机制的多样性.本文采用文献分析和逻辑分析的方法,通过介绍美国、澳大利亚和日本残疾人体育竞赛纠纷经典案例,对各国残疾人体育竞赛纠纷解决机制及其特点进行考察.研究认为:对于涉及人权和歧视的残疾人体育竞赛纠纷,美国适用诉讼机制,一般采用诉讼和解制度;澳大利亚主要适用调解机制;日本残疾人专项体育竞赛的参赛资格纠纷适用体育仲裁机制.基于此,对各国残疾人体育竞赛纠纷解决的实践差异进行比较,并探寻其发展趋势,结合中国残疾人体育竞赛纠纷解决机制现状,提出完善建议:改进残、健体育组织内部解纷机制;建立残疾人体育纠纷调解机构;设立残疾人体育仲裁分支机构;完善残疾人体育诉讼机制,从而推进残疾人体育竞赛纠纷多元化解决机制建设,切实维护残疾人体育竞赛合法权益.%The particularity of disputes in sports contest for persons with disabilities determines the diversity of their dispute resolution mechanism. This paper, employing the method of literature review and logical analysis, intro-duces three typical cases in the US, Australia and Japan respectively, investigates the dispute resolution mecha-nisms and their characteristics. The results suggest that if a dispute involves human rights and disability dis-crimination, the lawsuit conciliation is applied in the U S, the mediation mechanism is applied in Australia;and the arbitration mechanism is applied to sportsman qualification dispute in Japan. Based on a comparison of the dispute resolution practices in different countries, and exploration of the development trend, with reference to the status quo in China, the paper puts forward the following suggestions: improving the internal dispute reso-lution mechanism of sports organizations for both the disabled and the able-bodied; establishing sports dispute mediation institution and arbitration branches for persons with disabilities; and perfecting the lawsuit mechanism to promote the construction of the diversified dispute resolution mechanism, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the disabled in sports contest effectively.
展开▼
