论公司法上补充责任的共同诉讼形态--以类似必要共同诉讼为出发点

摘要

The joint action forms of supplementary liability have been the focus of theoretical debate. It is conducive to extend the range of logical joint decision to including similar necessary joint actions in solving the problem. The expansion of application scope of the similar necessary joint action lifts the limitation on litigation subject;accordingly, the view should be amended that the judgment criterion for joint decision is extension of Res Judicata. When the creditors singularly sue the shareholders for the first time, due to a logical necessity for joint decision, it is compulsory to endow the creditors with additional rights to involve companies in litigation. As common litigants, the company and the shareholders’ favorable actions concerning the basic facts of the claims and debts of taken shall extend to all, while all adverse actions extend only to themselves.%补充责任的共同诉讼形态一直是理论争议的焦点，而将类似必要共同诉讼合一确定的范围扩及逻辑上有合一确定必要之情形，有助于该问题的解决。类似必要共同诉讼适用范围之扩张，使其不再局限于诉讼标的同一，以既判力扩张为合一确定判断标准的观点也应得到修正。在债权人先单独起诉股东时，因具备逻辑上合一确定之必要而应赋予债权人追加公司参与诉讼的权利。公司、股东作为共同诉讼人，对债权债务这一基础事实所采取的有利诉讼行为及于全体，所有不利诉讼行为仅及于自己。