首页> 外文学位 >Contested reinterpretation of sustainable architecture: Authenticity of ecological place-making in organic food facilities.
【24h】

Contested reinterpretation of sustainable architecture: Authenticity of ecological place-making in organic food facilities.

机译:对可持续建筑的有争议的重新诠释:有机食品设施中生态场所营造的真实性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Public Markets were the predominant way Americans shopped for food before the Second World War. Public Markets were replaced by supermarkets that came to dominate the grocery scene. A supermarket is the last point in the supply chain of the production and distribution of food and is situated in most American communities by corporations. Alternatives to the supermarket exist in the form of cooperatives or as farm stores.;In recent years there has been an increased interest in food. Consumers expect it to be ecologically sustainable, healthy for our bodies, and everything we consume to be good in its implications to the planet. This trend in conscious choice is further extended to where we go to shop for food. Expectations of corporate practices in the facility design of grocery stores rise as the general public grows increasingly aware of ecological issues.;Ecological place-making and consumerism pose a fundamental conflict. The former assumes the intricacies and complexities of human behavior and the constraints imposed by the environment. The latter aspires to simple, general laws that cover all possible economic arrangements, such as technology, in a way that can be used by businesses. Ecological design, which is rooted in competing conceptions of environmentalism, however, should precede technological strategies in sustainable building design. This thesis adopts a framework of a social constructivist's perspective of ecological place-making, as proposed by Simon Guy and Graham Farmer, to help situate the trends of the emergent culture of sustainable architecture.;This thesis analyzes the trends in the architecture of grocery store facilities that offer natural, organic, and local foods. What are the alternatives to a supermarket in America today and what is the role of ecological place-making in each case? The analysis is about how our choice and awareness as a consumer, resident, or community member influences the design of food facilities. How does the trade of food influence design approaches and how does this further impact the environment as a whole and the ecology of the communities where we live?
机译:公开市场是第二次世界大战前美国人购物的主要方式。公共市场被超市所取代,而超市逐渐占据了食品杂货市场的主导地位。超级市场是食品生产和分配的供应链中的最后一点,并且在大多数美国社区中,公司都位于这个位置。超级市场的​​替代品以合作社的形式或作为农家商店的形式存在。近年来,人们对食品的兴趣日益增加。消费者期望它在生态上可持续发展,对我们的身体健康,我们所消费的一切对地球的影响都很好。这种有意识选择的趋势进一步扩展到我们去购物的地方。随着公众日益意识到生态问题,在杂货店设施设计中对公司实践的期望也越来越高。;生态场所营造和消费主义构成了根本冲突。前者假设人类行为的复杂性和复杂性以及环境所施加的约束。后者渴望以一种可以由企业使用的方式涵盖所有可能的经济安排(例如技术)的简单,通用的法律。然而,生态设计植根于相互竞争的环保主义理念,但在可持续建筑设计中应先于技术策略。本文采用了西蒙·盖伊(Simon Guy)和格雷厄姆·法默(Graham Farmer)提出的社会建构主义者对生态场所营造的观点框架,以帮助定位可持续建筑新兴文化的发展趋势。本论文分析了杂货店建筑的发展趋势。提供天然,有机和当地食品的设施。如今,美国超市有哪些替代方案?在每种情况下,生态场所营造的作用是什么?分析是关于我们作为消费者,居民或社区成员的选择和意识如何影响食品设施的设计。食品贸易如何影响设计方法,以及如何进一步影响整个环境和我们所居住社区的生态?

著录项

  • 作者

    Madhavan, Aparna.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Architecture.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号