首页> 外文学位 >Examining a strengths-based approach to employee engagement and the mediating effects of strengths self-efficacy.
【24h】

Examining a strengths-based approach to employee engagement and the mediating effects of strengths self-efficacy.

机译:检查基于优势的员工敬业度方法以及优势自我效能感的中介作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of strengths-based feedback on engagement and its components of absorption, dedication and vigor. The study utilized the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). It was proposed that upon receiving strengths related feedback based on the Clifton StrengthsFinder RTM (CSF) assessment, participants would have higher engagement if the feedback was personalized based on their specific strengths than if the feedback was general. Additionally, utilizing social cognitive theory, strengths self-efficacy (SSE) was proposed to mediate the relationship between feedback and engagement. The participants were 68 employees recruited from a variety of organizations. They were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the Control Group, Generalized Feedback Group or Personalized Feedback Group. Both treatment groups took the CSF, however participants in the Generalized Feedback Group received general feedback on strengths and how they can help at work.;The Personalized Feedback Group received personalized feedback about their strengths via an online Gallup website. Subsequently, both Treatment Groups took the SSE and UWES measures, and completed demographic items. The Control Group did not take the CSF; however, they took the SSE and UWES measures, and completed the demographic items. An omnibus MANOVA test revealed that there were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of their engagement and self-efficacy; thus, the study's hypotheses were not supported. There was, however, a significant positive correlation between strengths self-efficacy and engagement across all participants. In addition, the study used a newly developed SSE measure and contributed to its validation. Results of an exploratory factor analysis performed on the 34-item SSE scale's items concurred with a previously reported more parsimonious two-factor 16-item scale. Overall, the study contributed to the literature on engagement and positive psychology by demonstrating the positive link between strengths self-efficacy and engagement. However, it also revealed that receiving strengths feedback alone is not sufficient to impact strengths self-efficacy and engagement. Future researchers are encouraged to conduct further explorations into the mechanisms driving the strengths and engagement relationship.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验基于力量的反馈对敬业度及其吸收,奉献和活力成分的影响。该研究利用了乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)。有人提出,在收到基于Clifton StrengthsFinder RTM(CSF)评估的与力量相关的反馈后,如果根据他们的特定优势对反馈进行个性化设置,则参与者的参与度将高于一般反馈。此外,利用社会认知理论,提出了自我效能感(SSE)来调节反馈与参与之间的关系。参与者是从各种组织中招募的68名员工。他们被随机分配到三个组之一:对照组,广义反馈组或个性化反馈组。两个治疗组都接受了CSF,但是通用反馈组的参与者收到了有关优势及其在工作中如何提供帮助的一般反馈。个性化反馈组通过在线Gallup网站收到了有关其优势的个性化反馈。随后,两个治疗组都采取了SSE和UWES措施,并完成了人口统计项目。对照组没有服用脑脊液;但是,他们采取了SSE和UWES措施,并完成了人口统计项目。一项综合MANOVA测试显示,三组在参与度和自我效能方面没有显着差异。因此,该研究的假设不受支持。但是,所有参与者的力量自我效能与参与之间存在显着的正相关。此外,该研究使用了新开发的SSE量度,并对其验证做出了贡献。在34项SSE量表的项目上进行的探索性因素分析的结果与先前报道的更为简约的两因素16项量表相一致。总体而言,该研究通过证明力量自我效能感与参与之间的正向联系,为参与和积极心理学研究做出了贡献。然而,这也表明仅接受力量反馈不足以影响力量的自我效能和敬业度。鼓励未来的研究人员对驱动力量和参与关系的机制进行进一步探索。

著录项

  • 作者

    Collins, Kristen Kimberly.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral.;Psychology Industrial.;Business Administration Management.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 134 p.
  • 总页数 134
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号