首页> 外文学位 >The effects of automatic and manual door opening systems: A cross-sectional investigation of bus operators.
【24h】

The effects of automatic and manual door opening systems: A cross-sectional investigation of bus operators.

机译:自动和手动开门系统的影响:公交车驾驶员的横断面研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The occupational health of bus operators has been reviewed for the past several decades with results pertaining to either the physical (e.g. whole body vibrations, cabin ergonomics) or psychological (e.g. job strain, control, dissatisfaction) demands of the job. Although this field has been studied extensively, a research gap of how the door opening system affects the health of bus operators still remains unanswered. Modern buses incorporate two types of door opening systems -- automatic and manual. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaires (NMQ) and the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) were used to cross-section the differences in musculoskeletal health between bus operators who use automatic and manual door opening systems.;The NMQ provides a means of understanding the prevalence of reported shoulder, neck and low back trouble. Twelve-month prevalence responses were consistent between this study and of that reported in the literature. The prevalence and odds of reporting trouble in the shoulder was marginally greater for bus operators who operated a manual door opening system compared to those who operated an automatic door opening system. The prevalence of reporting trouble in the neck and low back was comparable between both groups, as expected. Other variables of interest, such as age and months driving, were seen to be significant factors that affected trouble with the musculoskeletal system. Binary logistic regression equations were developed to predict the probability of reporting musculoskeletal trouble for each anatomical region of interest.;The responses to the psychosocial scales of the JCQ give way to the demand-control (D-C) model, which allows for an analysis of association with the reported musculoskeletal trouble. The use of self-reported JCQ items to determine the quadrants for the D-C model was unsuccessful in identifying participants at risk for reporting shoulder, neck or low back trouble.;This study however, did suggest that bus operation is a mixture of high/low psychological job demand and high/low decision latitude, which supports findings of other studies. This study demonstrates that the active and low strain quadrants contained the most data points (40 and 47%, respectively). For both manual and automatic door users, the high strain quadrant contained the least amount of data points.
机译:在过去的几十年中,对公共汽车操作员的职业健康进行了审查,其结果与工作的身体要求(例如,全身振动,客舱人体工程学)或心理要求(例如,工作压力,控制,不满意)有关。尽管已经对该领域进行了广泛的研究,但是关于开门系统如何影响公交运营商健康的研究差距仍然悬而未决。现代公共汽车结合了两种类型的开门系统-自动和手动。使用北欧肌肉骨骼问卷(NMQ)和工作内容问卷(JCQ)来剖析使用自动和手动开门系统的巴士运营商之间骨骼骨骼健康的差异。肩部,颈部和腰部不适。这项研究与文献报道的十二个月患病率反应一致。与使用自动开门系统的公交车操作员相比,使用手动开门系统的公交车操作员在肩上报告故障的患病率和患病几率略高。如预期的那样,两组之间在颈部和腰部报告问题的患病率相当。其他令人感兴趣的变量,例如年龄和驾驶月份,被认为是影响肌肉骨骼系统问题的重要因素。开发了二进制逻辑回归方程来预测每个感兴趣的解剖区域报告肌肉骨骼疾病的可能性。;对JCQ的心理社会规模的反应让位于需求控制(DC)模型,该模型可用于分析关联据报道有肌肉骨骼疾病。使用自我报告的JCQ项来确定DC模型的象限无法成功识别有报告肩颈,颈背或腰背麻烦风险的参与者。然而,这项研究确实表明,公交车操作是高/低混合的心理工作需求和决策自由度高/低,这支持了其他研究的发现。这项研究表明,活动和低应变象限包含最多的数据点(分别为40%和47%)。对于手动和自动门用户,高应变象限包含最少数量的数据点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drucker, Christopher J.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Occupational Health and Safety.;Engineering Industrial.;Health Sciences Epidemiology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 职业性疾病预防;一般工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号