首页> 外文学位 >Return to authority: The monothelete controversy and the role of text, emperor and council in the Sixth Ecumenical Council.
【24h】

Return to authority: The monothelete controversy and the role of text, emperor and council in the Sixth Ecumenical Council.

机译:回归权威:在第六大公会议中,有关单座戏的争论以及文本,皇帝和议会的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An extensive investigation of the acta of the sixth ecumenical council (680-81) in Constantinople, this study traces the intensified Byzantine use of patristic citations and the revival of imperial authority in the seventh century in the wake of the Islamic conquests and the major religious controversy of monotheletism. Byzantines identified authoritative texts according to their antiquity, the reputation of their authors and their compatibility with orthodox consensus, and Byzantines on all sides of religious controversy increasingly relied on patristic texts to vindicate their positions during theological debate. Byzantine cultural values and assumptions were embedded in their theological and polemical literature and can be recovered from these sources. Controversies over the will and energy of Christ provided the language and occasion for publicly contesting concepts of agency, freedom, authority and human nature. The seventh century witnessed the renewed role of the emperor in the church and the church's acceptance of his involvement. The sixth council represented the moment when a Byzantine emperor, Constantine IV (668-685), directed a church council more directly than any since Constantine I.;The study also includes a revisionist account of the origin and rise of monothelete Christianity as the official doctrine of the Byzantine state, and considers how monothelete Christians understood their doctrine and what cultural meaning it held for them. Monotheletism, the doctrine that Christ possessed only one, divine will, was not a politically-inspired device used to reconcile dissident churches in the eastern provinces of Byzantium, but was a natural expression of theological developments over the previous century and an example of an alternative Syrian Christianity that endured for centuries after the eastern provinces had been lost to the Byzantines.
机译:这项研究对君士坦丁堡第六次世界大公会议(680-81)的行为进行了广泛的调查,追溯了拜占庭式的对爱国主义的引用以及帝国主义在第七世纪伊斯兰征服和主要宗教之后的复兴一神论的争议。拜占庭人根据其古代,作者的声誉以及他们与正统共识的相容性来确定权威文本,而在宗教争议中,拜占庭人越来越多地依赖爱国文本来证明他们在神学辩论中的立场。拜占庭的文化价值观和假设被嵌入其神学和辩证法文献中,并且可以从这些来源中获得。关于基督的意志和能量的争论为公开辩论代理,自由,权威和人性的观念提供了语言和场合。七世纪见证了皇帝在教会中的新角色以及教会对他的参与的接受。第六届理事会代表了拜占庭皇帝君士坦丁四世(668-685年)指导教会理事会的时间比君士坦丁一世以来更直接的时刻;该研究还包括修正主义的论点,即单天主教徒基督教的起源和兴起拜占庭国家的教义,并考虑独身的基督徒如何理解他们的教义以及该教义对他们具有什么文化意义。独一论是基督只拥有一个神圣意志的学说,它不是用来调和东部拜占庭省持不同政见的教堂的政治灵感工具,而是自然地表达了上个世纪的神学发展,并且是一个替代的例子。在东部各省被拜占庭人击败之后,叙利亚基督教经历了几个世纪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号