首页> 外文学位 >Three-Dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Volume Registration for the Analysis of Alveolar Bone Changes.
【24h】

Three-Dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Volume Registration for the Analysis of Alveolar Bone Changes.

机译:用于分析牙槽骨变化的三维锥束计算机断层扫描体积配准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: 1. Determine accuracy of detecting alveolar bone loss affecting tooth support with registered cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to intraoral radiographs (IO). 2. Assess repeatability of measurements with CBCT compared to IO. 3. Identify factors which may affect defect detection. 4. Determine effect of bucco-lingual bone thickness on defect detection. Methods: Defects were created in mandibles and imaged pre-, post-defect with IO and CBCT. Six observers viewed IO radiographs pre-, post-defect followed by CBCTs to determine defect presence and extent. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, logistic regression were used. Inter-, intra-observer agreement were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient and weighted kappa. Results: Mean ROC Az for CBCT (0.90) was not statistically different from mean Az of IO (0.81). CBCT sensitivity was higher than IO sensitivity (0.85 vs. 0.63, p0.05). Bone thickness, imaging modality, observer had significant effects on bone loss detection. Odds ratio for CBCT vs. IO diagnostic accuracy was 2.29. Odds ratio for bucco-lingual bone thickness was 1.52. There was moderate agreement between observers and substantial agreement within observers for detection of bone loss and measurement of extent. Conclusions: CBCT showed equivalent diagnostic efficacy and specificity for defect detection, but higher sensitivity than IO. CBCT more than doubles the odds of accurate bone loss assessment compared to IO. Odds of bone loss detection increase by approximately 50% per millimeter of bucco-lingual bone loss.
机译:目标:1.确定与套内放射线照相(IO)相比,用注册的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检测影响牙支持的牙槽骨丢失的准确性。 2.与IO相比,评估CBCT测量的可重复性。 3.确定可能影响缺陷检测的因素。 4.确定颊舌骨厚度对缺陷检测的影响。方法:在下颌骨中创建缺陷,并使用IO和CBCT对缺陷进行前后成像。六名观察员在缺陷发生之前,之后,随后的CBCT中查看了IO射线照片,以确定缺陷的存在和程度。使用受试者工作特征(ROC),敏感性,特异性,逻辑回归。观察者之间,观察者之间的一致性通过组内相关系数和加权κ评估。结果:CBCT的平均ROC Az(0.90)与IO的平均Az(0.81)在统计学上没有差异。 CBCT敏感性高于IO敏感性(0.85 vs. 0.63,p0.05)。骨厚,成像方式,观察者对骨丢失检测有显着影响。 CBCT与IO诊断准确率的比值为2.29。颊舌骨厚度的比值比为1.52。观察者之间达成了中度共识,而观察者内部就骨丢失检测和程度测量达成了实质性共识。结论:CBCT显示出与缺陷检测同等的诊断功效和特异性,但灵敏度高于IO。与IO相比,CBCT进行准确的骨丢失评估的几率增加了一倍以上。每毫米颊舌骨丢失的骨丢失检测几率增加约50%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Green, Peter Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 58 p.
  • 总页数 58
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号