首页> 外文学位 >Writing Chinese laws: The form and function of statutes in Qin legal culture.
【24h】

Writing Chinese laws: The form and function of statutes in Qin legal culture.

机译:撰写中国法律:秦法律文化中法规的形式和功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The legal institutions of the short-lived Qin dynasty (221 BCE-207 BCE) have been vilified by history as harsh and draconian. Yet ironically, many Qin institutional features, such as written statutory law, were readily adopted by subsequent dynasties as the primary means for maintaining administrative and social control. How did the influential Qin legal institutions based on written law develop? This dissertation will utilize both traditional received texts and archeologically excavated legal materials in an attempt to ascertain first, what socio-political conditions provided the rationale for the production of law in written form in the kingdom of Qin; and second to consider how the intended function of written law influenced the linguistic composition of legal statutes, as well as their physical construction.;From amidst the endemic warfare of the aptly named Warring States Period (481-221 BCE) one kingdom, the Qin, rose to successfully consolidate its authority over the other kingdoms through military conquest. In so doing, it established the first imperial dynasty of China administered by a centralized, impersonal bureaucratic government. The success of this consolidation depended upon the effective implementation of government policies, whose origins predate the unification of 221 BCE, that were to replace the increasingly defunct systems of aristocratic political order based primarily on the reciprocal obligations defined through lineage affiliation. Over time, such lineage affiliations weakened, and resulted in the rise of powerful ministerial families capable of directly challenging the authority of the ruler and sometimes leading to rulers being deposed or even assassinated. The new order envisioned by the Qin would be headed by a central government represented in and connected to the periphery through an impersonal bureaucracy of officials with legally defined jurisdictions. The establishment of various socio-political institutions of the Qin, such as universal standards for all regions (e.g., axle widths, weights, written script), were also vital to the effort of creating a level of institutional homogeneity and administrative predictability within geographic boundaries formerly governed by disparate institutions. This grand- scale restructuring over such a large territory required a high level of social and administrative control. This was secured through a legal framework in which bureaucratic and social existence came to be defined and judged according to written legal statutes.;Yet how did writing come to be used for the purpose of composing and transmitting law? And how were laws composed so as to maximize their efficacy in attaining the desired goals of the legislative drafters? This dissertation seeks to answer these two questions by applying a function and form approach to the study of excavated legal manuscripts from Qin. To understand the function ascribed to law by the Qin, I draw upon theories from Law and Society literature to illustrate the ways in which social and political changes influence legal changes, and also how responsive legal reforms can be directed to elicit targeted social or political change. The received philosophical literature and traditional Chinese histories recording the socio-political milieu of Qin provide evidence with which we can reconstruct certain elements of these socio-legal processes. The addition of enewf sources of Qin law in the form of archeologically excavated legal manuscripts over the past seventy years allows us to further refine such reconstructions. With a clearer understanding of the role of law in Qin culture, I then turn my attention to the form of written laws by applying legal-linguistic methods to a codicological and linguistic analysis of a corpus of legal documents from the tomb of a county-level Qin official discovered by archeologists in the 1975. Such an approach allows me to demonstrate how the envisioned function of legal statutes directly influenced the linguistic composition and physical production of such legal texts. In this way, this dissertation elucidates the role of writing in the conceptualization and composition of written law in Qin.
机译:短命的秦王朝(公元前221年至公元前207年)的法律机构被历史as毁为苛刻和严酷的历史。然而具有讽刺意味的是,秦的许多制度特征,例如成文法,在随后的朝代很容易被采纳为维持行政和社会控制的主要手段。有影响力的基于成文法的秦制法律制度是如何发展的?本论文将利用传统的接受文本和考古发掘的法律材料,试图首先确定什么社会政治条件为秦国书面法律的产生提供了理论依据;其次,要考虑成文法的预期功能如何影响法律法规的语言组成及其物理结构。从恰当地命名为战国时期(公元前481-221年)的地方战争中,一个王国即秦,通过军事征服成功地巩固了其对其他王国的权威。这样,它建立了中国第一个皇朝,由一个集权的,非人事的官僚政府管理。这种巩固的成功取决于政府政策的有效实施,其起源早于公元前221年的统一,这些政策将取代主要基于世系隶属关系确定的对立义务而逐渐消失的贵族政治秩序体系。随着时间的流逝,这种宗族关系减弱了,导致强大的部长级家庭的崛起,这些家庭能够直接挑战统治者的权威,有时甚至导致统治者被罢免甚至被暗杀。秦国所设想的新命令将由一个中央政府领导,该中央政府通过具有合法权限的官员的非人事官僚机构在外围与周边建立联系。秦的各种社会政治制度的建立,例如所有地区的通用标准(例如,车轴宽度,重量,书面文字),对于在地理范围内建立一定水平的制度同质性和行政可预测性的努力也至关重要。以前由不同的机构管理。在如此大的领土上进行的大规模重组需要高度的社会和行政控制。这是通过法律框架来确保的,在该法律框架中,根据书面法律法规来定义和判断官僚和社会存在。但是,如何将写作用于撰写和传播法律的目的呢?又如何制定法律以最大程度地实现立法起草人的预期目标?本文试图通过功能和形式的方法来研究秦出土的法律手稿来回答这两个问题。为了了解秦人赋予法律的功能,我借鉴法律和社会文献的理论来说明社会和政治变革对法律变革的影响方式,以及如何针对性地进行法律改革以引发有针对性的社会或政治变革。 。记录了秦的社会政治环境的哲学文献和中国传统史为我们重构这些社会法律过程的某些要素提供了证据。在过去的七十年中,以考古发掘出的法律手稿的形式增加了秦法的enewf来源,这使我们能够进一步完善这种重构。在对法律在秦文化中的作用有了更清晰的了解之后,我将注意力转向成文法的形式,方法是将法律语言方法应用于县级陵墓中一系列法律文件的医学和语言学分析秦官员于1975年由考古学家发现。这种方法使我能够证明法律法规的预期功能如何直接影响此类法律文本的语言组成和实际生产。通过这种方式,本文阐明了写作在秦代成文法概念化和组成中的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Caldwell, Perry Ernest, IV.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Law.;Linguistics.;Asian history.;Ancient history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 307 p.
  • 总页数 307
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号