首页> 外文学位 >From Deliberation to Participation: John Dewey's Challenge to Contemporary Democratic Theory.
【24h】

From Deliberation to Participation: John Dewey's Challenge to Contemporary Democratic Theory.

机译:从审议到参与:约翰·杜威对当代民主理论的挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation uses John Dewey's democratic theory to lead contemporary democratic thought away from the principles endorsed by deliberative democracy. I argue against the widely-accepted view that Dewey should be classified as a forefather of deliberative democracy, and I show instead that Dewey's theory effectively exposes shortcomings in deliberative theory. Dewey associates democracy with the possibilities for individuals to participate in the governing of their lives, and he highlights how these possibilities are affected no less by social and economic inequality than by political institutions, and how political institutions themselves cannot be isolated from the effects of social and economic inequality. On Dewey's terms, then, democracy involves a continuous process of overcoming interrelated social and political obstacles to individual self-government, rather than the achievement of a particular kind of deliberation within political forums. Deliberative theorists, by contrast, must isolate the political and social realms when they indicate that deliberative reason-giving in political forums will neutralize the effects of unequal social status. Dewey's theory in fact illustrates the need for democracy itself to evolve in its methods for achieving self-government, rather than being solely equated with deliberative reason-giving. Dewey shows us that, under conditions of structural social inequality, the practice of deliberation may produce undemocratic effects, and that non-deliberative practices such as broad-based social movements may be necessary to overcome such inequality. Dewey's position also would make the process of overcoming social inequality into a central aim of democratic theory. Some deliberative theorists do note (as an addendum to their focus on deliberation) that such inequality must be reduced, but they fail to explain how such a requirement could be attained through the deliberative practices they describe. Finally, Dewey can also demonstrate the potential value of "participatory democracy" (now widely assumed to be incorporated by deliberative democracy) to contemporary democratic thought. Participatory theory primarily advocates the democratization of both political and non-political authority structures, and Dewey's focus on continuously overcoming interrelated political and social obstacles to individual self-government can cogently illustrate the insights of participatory theory which are independent of deliberative theory.
机译:本文运用约翰·杜威的民主理论,将当代民主思想带离了协商民主所认可的原则。我反对广为接受的观点,即杜威应被视为协商民主的先驱,而我却表明杜威的理论有效地揭示了协商理论的不足。杜威将民主与个人参与其生活管理的可能性联系起来,他着重强调了社会和经济不平等对这些可能性的影响不亚于政治制度的影响,以及政治制度本身如何不能与社会的影响相隔离。和经济不平等。用杜威的话说,民主涉及一个连续的过程,该过程要克服相互联系的社会和政治障碍,阻碍个人自治,而不是在政治论坛中实现某种特殊的审议。相反,商议理论家指出政治论坛中的考虑性理性将抵消不平等社会地位的影响时,必须隔离政治和社会领域。杜威的理论实际上表明,民主本身需要发展其实现自治的方法,而不是仅仅与审议的推理相提并论。杜威向我们表明,在结构性社会不平等的条件下,审议的实践可能会产生不民主的影响,而为克服这种不平等而进行的非协商性实践(例如基础广泛的社会运动)可能是必要的。杜威的立场还将使克服社会不平等的过程成为民主理论的中心目标。一些协商理论家确实注意到(作为对审议工作的补充),必须减少这种不平等,但他们无法解释如何通过他们所描述的协商实践来达到这种要求。最后,杜威还可以证明“参与式民主”(现在被广泛认为是审议性民主纳入)对于当代民主思想的潜在价值。参与理论主要倡导政治和非政治权威结构的民主化,而杜威对持续克服相互联系的政治和社会障碍进行个体自治的关注可以有力地说明参与理论的见解,而这些独立于审议理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jackson, Jeffrey Charles.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号