首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of the content and quality of information advertised on retail websites marketing herbal weight loss supplements in the United States.
【24h】

Evaluation of the content and quality of information advertised on retail websites marketing herbal weight loss supplements in the United States.

机译:对在美国营销草药减肥补品的零售网站上广告的信息的内容和质量的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content and quality of information advertised on websites that market herbal weight loss supplements. The researcher completed Google, Yahoo, and Bing searches using the keywords "natural weight loss" and "natural weight loss supplements" to identify 46 websites. A content analysis was performed using a Website Data Extraction Tool, modified from Jordan and Haywood (2007). The accuracy of information was also assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to record the FDA labeling information, safety information, and "red flags" (misleading or inaccurate information). The content analysis revealed that websites posted adequate labeling information required by the FDA. Safety information: adverse reactions (27.3%), contraindications (32.6%), and drug-supplement interactions (23.3%) were posted on the websites. Forty-five (97.8%) websites included "red flags." In addition, misleading weight loss expectations (23.9%) and misleading product safety claims (43.5%) were included. Thirty-four websites posted mechanisms of actions and only 35.3% of these were considered correct. Weight loss supplement websites place online consumers at risk because they provide misleading information and inadequate safety information. Consumers should analyze product claims and the sources providing the information. These results can aid dietitians in helping their patients understand the risks of consuming herbal weight loss supplements.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在销售草药减肥补品的网站上广告的信息的内容和质量。研究人员使用关键字“自然减肥”和“自然减肥补充剂”完成了Google,Yahoo和Bing的搜索,以识别46个网站。使用乔丹和海伍德(2007)修改的网站数据提取工具进行了内容分析。还评估了信息的准确性。描述性统计数据用于记录FDA标签信息,安全信息和“红色标志”(误导或不正确的信息)。内容分析显示,网站发布了FDA要求的充分标签信息。安全信息:不良反应(27.3%),禁忌症(32.6%)和药物与药物的相互作用(23.3%)已发布在网站上。四十五(97.8%)个网站包含“红色标志”。此外,还包括误导性减肥预期(23.9%)和误导性产品安全性声明(43.5%)。 34个网站发布了动作机制,其中只有35.3%被认为是正确的。减肥补品网站使在线消费者面临风险,因为他们会提供误导性信息和不足的安全性信息。消费者应分析产品声明以及提供信息的来源。这些结果可以帮助营养师帮助患者了解服用草药减肥补品的风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wiess, Kaitlyn M.;

  • 作者单位

    D'Youville College.;

  • 授予单位 D'Youville College.;
  • 学科 Nutrition.;Marketing.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 142 p.
  • 总页数 142
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号