首页> 外文学位 >Evaluating water resource management in transboundary river basins using cooperative game theory: The Rio Grande/Bravo basin.
【24h】

Evaluating water resource management in transboundary river basins using cooperative game theory: The Rio Grande/Bravo basin.

机译:使用合作博弈理论评估跨界流域的水资源管理:里奥格兰德/布拉沃流域。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Water resource management is a multifaceted issue that becomes more complex when considering multiple nations' interdependence upon a single shared transboundary river basin. With over 200 transboundary river basins worldwide shared by two or more countries, it is important to develop tools to allow riparian countries to cooperatively manage these shared and often limited water resources. Cooperative game theory provides tools for determining if cooperation can exist across jurisdictional boundaries through a suite of mathematical tools that measure the benefits of cooperation among basin stakeholders. Cooperative game theory is also useful for transboundary negotiation because it provides a range of solutions which will satisfy all players in the game and provides methods to fairly and equitably allocate the gains of that cooperation to all participating stakeholders, if that cooperation is shown to be possible. This dissertation applies cooperative game theory concepts to the Rio Grande/Bravo basin in North America as a case study. The Rio Grande/Bravo forms the 1,200 km border between the United States and Mexico. A comprehensive water resources planning model was developed for the basin including the major water users, water related infrastructure including reservoirs, and water policy logic related to the bi-national water sharing agreements. The water planning model is used to calculate the characteristic functions for the cooperative game analysis. For the Water Demand Reduction Game, the largest agricultural users, District 005, District 025 and the Texas Watermaster Section below Falcon were defined individual players. The cooperative analysis was between the individual players rather than the countries. In addition to the cooperative analysis, performance measures for water deliveries were calculated to determine if water delivery was improved to each player under the cooperative game. The results show that the amount of additional water to the downstream players may not be large enough to induce cooperation. The small amount of increase in water deliveries is related to the large system losses as the water travels downstream over a long distance and a division of water under the 1944 Treaty between the United States and Mexico.
机译:水资源管理是一个多方面的问题,当考虑到多个国家对一个共享的跨界流域的相互依赖时,水资源管理将变得更加复杂。全世界有两个或多个国家共享200多个跨界流域,因此重要的是要开发工具,以使河岸国家能够共同管理这些共享且往往有限的水资源。合作博弈理论通过一套衡量流域利益相关者之间合作收益的数学工具,提供了确定合作是否可以跨越管辖范围进行的工具。合作博弈理论对于跨界谈判也很有用,因为它提供了一系列解决方案,将使博弈中的所有参与者都满意,并提供了将这种合作的收益公平合理地分配给所有参与的利益相关者的方法,如果这种合作被证明是可能的。本文以合作博弈理论为例,将合作博弈理论应用于北美的里奥格兰德/布拉沃盆地。里奥格兰德州/布拉沃州形成美国和墨西哥之间1,200公里的边界。为流域开发了一个综合的水资源规划模型,包括主要用水户,与水相关的基础设施(包括水库)以及与两国水共享协议有关的水政策逻辑。水计划模型用于计算合作博弈分析的特征函数。在减少用水需求游戏中,最大的农业用户,即地区005,地区025和猎鹰下的得克萨斯水资源主管部门被定义为个人玩家。合作分析是个体参与者之间而不是国家之间。除了合作分析外,还计算了供水绩效指标,以确定在合作博弈中每个玩家的供水是否有所改善。结果表明,向下游参与者提供的额外水量可能不足以引起合作。输水量的少量增加与较大的系统损失有关,这是因为水向下游长距离行进,以及根据1944年《美国和墨西哥之间的条约》对水进行分配。

著录项

  • 作者

    Teasley, Rebecca Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.;Engineering Environmental.;Water Resource Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 169 p.
  • 总页数 169
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号