首页> 外文学位 >Sunshine in the Show-me State: Open records and open meetings legislation and litigation in Missouri.
【24h】

Sunshine in the Show-me State: Open records and open meetings legislation and litigation in Missouri.

机译:Show-me州的阳光:在密苏里州进行公开记录并公开会议立法和诉讼。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This comprehensive study evaluates the status of the public's right under Missouri law to inspect government records and attend government meetings. After a review of the state's common law and constitutional provisions, the research focuses on two access statutes of general application, the Open Records Act of 1961 and the Sunshine Law of 1973.;Journalists played major roles in the passage of both the Open Records Act and the Sunshine Law. Both statutes primarily affect the executive branch of government.;Because of Missouri's liberal common law tradition, the Open Records Act seems to have had little positive impact on the public's right to inspect government records. In contrast, the Sunshine Law has been continually strengthened and now appears to fulfill most of the criteria that scholars suggest are necessary far a good open records law. Its provisions for open meetings, however, while considerably stronger now than when the law was initially enacted, do not yet embrace all the components that, according to observers, should be part of an excellent open meetings law.;Interpretations of the two laws by both the judiciary and the Attorney General have been mixed, and sufficient precedents exist for an opinion to reflect just about any position a writer might wish to adopt with regard to open government. Enforcement of the statutes seems to have been lax, but compliance appears to be better than might be expected. A substantial majority of both prosecuting attorneys and editors responding to the survey speculated that public governmental bodies abide by the Sunshine Law's access provisions at least 70% of the time.;The legislative history of each law and of subsequent amendments to the Sunshine Law (the Open Records Act has never been amended) is developed, and connections between these legislative enactments and the existing political and social environment are examined. Legal interpretations of each law by the courts and the Attorney General are analyzed. The state of compliance with and enforcement of the Sunshine Law, derived from a survey of prosecuting attorneys and editors, is assessed.
机译:这项全面的研究评估了密苏里州法律规定的检查政府记录和参加政府会议的公众权利的状况。在审查了该州的普通法和宪法规定之后,该研究侧重于两个普遍适用的访问法规,即1961年的《公开记录法》和1973年的《阳光法》;记者在《公开记录法》的通过中发挥了主要作用。以及《阳光法》。这两项法规主要影响政府的行政部门。由于密苏里州的自由主义习惯法传统,《公开记录法》似乎对公众检查政府记录的权利几乎没有积极影响。相比之下,《阳光法》得到了不断加强,现在看来已经满足了学者们认为是一项良好的公开记录法所必需的大多数标准。但是,其有关公开会议的规定虽然现在比最初颁布该法律时要强得多,但尚未涵盖应作为优秀公开会议法律一部分的所有组成部分。司法机构和总检察长都混在一起,并且已有足够的先例可用于反映作者可能希望在公开政府方面采取的任何立场。法规的执行似乎松懈,但合规性似乎好于预期。接受调查的起诉律师和编辑中的绝大多数都认为,公共政府机构至少在70%的时间内遵守《阳光法》的准入规定。;每部法律的立法历史以及随后对《阳光法》的修正案(未对《公开记录法案》进行过修订),并研究了这些立法法规与现有政治和社会环境之间的联系。分析了法院和总检察长对每项法律的法律解释。对起诉律师和编辑的调查得出的《阳光法》的遵守和执行状态进行了评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Norton, Wayne A.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Southern Mississippi.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Southern Mississippi.;
  • 学科 Mass communication.;Journalism.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 579 p.
  • 总页数 579
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号