首页> 外文学位 >Zwei Skandalstuecke im Kontext von Antisemitismus: Thomas Bernhards 'Heldenplatz' und Rainer Werner Fassbinders 'Der Muell, die Stadt und der Tod'.
【24h】

Zwei Skandalstuecke im Kontext von Antisemitismus: Thomas Bernhards 'Heldenplatz' und Rainer Werner Fassbinders 'Der Muell, die Stadt und der Tod'.

机译:反犹太主义背景下的两个丑闻片段:托马斯·伯恩哈德(Thomas Bernhard)的“赫尔登广场(Heldenplatz)”和雷纳·沃纳·法斯宾德(Rainer Werner Fassbinder)的“垃圾,城市与死亡”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the 1980s Rainer Werner Fassbinders Der Müll, die Stadt und der Tod (1976) and Thomas Bernhard's Heldenplatz (1988) caused two of the biggest theatre scandals in the history of German-language literature, leading to extensive debates in the media. A comparative examination of the “Fassbinder-Kontroversen” (1976, 1984, 1985) and the “Causa Heldenplatz” (1988) reveals many crucial similarities. Both scandals must be understood within their historical and political context. Der Müll, die Stadt und der Tod was highly criticized as an anti-Semitic play, while Heldenplatz was said to slander crassly the Austrian people. Bernhard was also attacked for using Jews in a way which could reinforce latent anti-Semitic sentiments. This thesis questions such premises for their reductive readings of these texts.;Like Heldenplatz, Fassbinder's Der Müll, die Stadt und der Tod can be seen as a text that refutes the denial that there is no anti-Semitism in post-war German-speaking societies. The difference is that Fassbinder deals with the traumatization of his characters counter-intuitively, namely, by introducing the ironic, distancing effects of camp. In her essay “Notes on ‘Camp’”, Susan Sontag claims that camp “sees everything in quotation marks”. An analysis of Fassbinder's play reveals it to be a montage of citations and stereotypes. He thereby deconstructs and denounces stereotypes about Jews.;Bernhard's Heldenplatz can certainly be perceived as a play that was made to be scandal-provoking. Sigmund Freud's and William G. Niederland's theories on trauma, however, can lead to a deeper understanding of the text beyond the obvious level of provocation. Most commentary on the play criticizes it for portraying Jews as psychically diseased. My claim, by contrast, is that their neuroticism or traumatization should not be interpreted as limiting the political validity of their comments, but rather as an essential aspect of their protest against Austria's repression of its involvement in Nazi crimes.
机译:在1980年代,Rainer Werner Fassbinders DerMüll,Stadt und der Tod(1976)和Thomas Bernhard的Heldenplatz(1988)死于德语文学史上两次最大的戏剧丑闻,引起了媒体广泛的辩论。对“ Fassbinder-Kontroversen”(1976、1984、1985)和“ Causa Heldenplatz”(1988)的比较研究发现许多关键的相似之处。这两个丑闻必须在其历史和政治背景下加以理解。德·穆德(DerMüll),斯塔德·德·德·托德(Stadt und der der Tod)被批评为反犹太人的戏剧,而赫尔登广场(Heldenplatz)被to毁了奥地利人民。伯恩哈德(Bernhard)还因使用犹太人而受到攻击,这种方式可以强化潜在的反犹太情绪。本论文以此为前提来还原这些文本。(Fassbinder的DerMüll,Stadt und der Tod之类的Heldenplatz被视为文本,驳斥了否认战后德语中没有反犹太主义的文本)。社会。不同之处在于,法斯宾德(Fassbinder)直觉地处理了他的角色受到的创伤,即通过引入营地具有讽刺意味的疏远效果。苏珊·桑塔格(Susan Sontag)在她的论文“关于“营地”的笔记”中声称,营地“看到了所有用引号引起来的东西”。对法斯宾德戏剧的分析表明,这是引用和刻板印象的蒙太奇。因此,他解构并谴责了关于犹太人的刻板印象。伯恩哈德的《 Heldenplatz》当然可以被看作是一部令人发指的戏剧。但是,西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)和威廉·尼德兰(William G. Niederland)关于创伤的理论,可能会导致对文本的更深刻理解,而不仅仅是明显的挑衅。该剧中大多数评论都批评它把犹太人描绘成精神病患者。相比之下,我的主张是,他们的神经质或受创伤不应被解释为限制其言论的政治有效性,而应视为其抗议奥地利压制其参与纳粹犯罪的重要方面。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Waterloo (Canada).;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.;Theater History.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 108 p.
  • 总页数 108
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号