首页> 外文学位 >The politics of aestheticization: Zhou Zuoren and the crisis of the Chinese New Culture (1927-1937).
【24h】

The politics of aestheticization: Zhou Zuoren and the crisis of the Chinese New Culture (1927-1937).

机译:审美政治:周作人与中国新文化的危机(1927-1937)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Focusing on Zhou Zuoren (1885-1967), a leading essayist and intellectual in modern China, this thesis analyzes the unfolding of the "New Culture" during the 1930s. Rather than describing an evolution of the May Fourth literary and intellectual revolution, it seeks to fathom the changed structure of social, political and cultural relations in which the Chinese Enlightenment intellectuals were forced to rethink their agenda and adjust their strategy. Among the positions and alternatives conditioned but also suppressed by the Communist-Nationalist confrontation, this thesis examines the "libertarian" discourse--the discourse of the urban, educated middle class who kept a cautious distance from the predominant political forces--as it took shape, both aesthetically and politically, in Zhou Zuoren's production of the personal essay (xiaopinwen). It shows that this "libertarianism" differs significantly from the conventional picture of the Anglophilic liberalism embodied by Hu Shi and his followers. Instead of advocating a piecemeal evolution, thus compromising and cooperating with institutional power, Zhou Zuoren engaged in a subtle negotiation between, on the one hand, a radical notion of Enlightenment centered on the coming-into-being of the rational individual, and on the other hand, a prudent elaboration of his stylistic codes and symbolic community as an everyday culture. Via the medium of xiaopinwen, Zhou carried on the May Fourth commitment to the building of a "literature of the ordinary people" while accommodating the internal drive of the vernacular literature to become a belles lettres which provides a discursive location and aesthetic prestige for the modern Chinese literati in a turbulent social sphere.; Based on the dialectic between social and formal histories, this thesis argues that the aesthetic solution to a political dilemma must also be a political solution to an aesthetic one; that any intellectual intervention is simultaneously an innovative leap within the paradigmatic chain of that particular literary-discursive tradition. By analyzing the personal essay as a strategy of writing vis-a-vis the space of political positions and symbolic powers, it confronts the crisis of the Chinese New Culture striving to define itself between its conditions and ideologies.
机译:本文以现代中国著名的散文家和知识分子周作人(1885-1967)为重点,分析了1930年代“新文化”的发展。它没有描述五四文学和知识革命的演变,而是想了解社会,政治和文化关系的变化结构,在这种结构中,中国启蒙知识分子被迫重新考虑其议程并调整其策略。在受到共产主义和民族主义对抗影响但又受到压制的立场和选择中,本文考察了“自由主义者”的话语,即对受过教育的城市中产阶级的话语,他们与主流政治力量保持谨慎的距离。在周作人的个人论文(xiaopinwen)的作品中,无论从美学上还是政治上都受到影响。它表明,这种“自由主义”与胡适及其追随者所体现的传统的盎格鲁自由主义形象大相径庭。周作人没有提倡零散的发展,从而损害了体制的权力并与之合作,而是进行了一场微妙的谈判,一方面,一个激进的启蒙概念以理性的人的诞生为中心,而另一方面另一方面,对他的风格代码和象征性社区作为一种日常文化进行了审慎的阐述。通过小品文的媒介,周传承了“五四”建设“百姓文学”的承诺,同时适应了白话文学的内在驱动力,成为了当代艺术的代名词,为现代人提供了话语场所和审美声望。在一个动荡的社会领域中的中国文人。本文基于社会史和形式史之间的辩证法,认为政治困境的美学解决也必须是审美困境的政治解决。任何智力干预同时都是该特定文学话语传统范式链中的创新飞跃。通过将个人文章作为一种相对于政治立场和象征性权力的空间进行写作的策略进行分析,它面临着中国新文化的危机,该危机试图在其条件和意识形态之间界定自己。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhang, Xudong.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Literature Asian.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 269 p.
  • 总页数 269
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号