首页> 外文学位 >A social constructionist perspective on the Chinese lian/mian (face?) practices.
【24h】

A social constructionist perspective on the Chinese lian/mian (face?) practices.

机译:从社会建构论的角度看中国的练脸。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Chinese face practices lie at the heart of Chinese culture. These practices constitute a systematic grammar of action and a unique way of life which are proving to be incapable of facing the challenges of the modern life of instrumental rationality unless they get transformed. How can such a system of cultural practices get transformed so that the living Chinese tradition and the modern Western culture get creatively and selectively merged? How can Chinese culture emerge as a new and rejuvenated, open and flexible culture both sustainable and adaptable? This dissertation is a search for the answers.; This dissertation presents a social constructionist account for the Chinese face practices. It covers their various dimensions such as historical, emotional and consequential. It also offers a social constructionist critique of the generalist theories of face and ethnocultural studies of Chinese face practices. Using a social constructionist tool called Circular Questioning (CQ) together with the case study method, the study generates a tentative model of creative engagement with and grounded transformation of the Chinese face-centered social practices on the basis of the social constructionist critique of the revolutionary and individualistic models of transformation of the Chinese face practices. The study concludes that social constructionists in the Chinese contexts have a dual research agenda. On one hand, they have to curtail the excess of communalism which undermines the individual agency due to the face practices; on the other hand, they need to prevent the onslaught of unrestrained individual agency over community due to the complete abandonment of the face practices in the rush for the individual interests by means of capital, law and technology.; It also examines the affordances and constraints of CQ in the Chinese contexts and identifies what the author thinks are the major similarities and differences between the Chinese version of social constructionism and the Western communication version of social construction ism. The examination, comparison and contrast reveal that the Western social constructionism, a constructive modification of the modern Western culture, is one big step closer to Chinese culture than the modern Western culture. The two cultures also have a lot to learn from each other. The study theoretically implies a promising future of intercultural relations between the East and the West which both social constructionists with a research agenda in the East and those in the West can jointly construct.
机译:中国人的面孔练习是中国文化的核心。这些实践构成了系统的动作语法和独特的生活方式,除非经过改造,否则它们将无法面对工具理性现代生活的挑战。如何改变这种文化实践体系,使活的中国传统与现代西方文化创造性地,有选择地融合在一起?中国文化如何才能成为一种既可持续又适应性强的新活力,开放,灵活的文化?本文旨在寻找答案。本文提出了一个社会建构主义者对中国人面孔实践的解释。它涵盖了他们的各个方面,例如历史,情感和结果。它也对社会主义的面孔理论和对中国面孔实践的民族文化研究提出了批判。该研究使用名为循环提问(CQ)的社会建构主义工具和案例研究方法,在对革命者的社会建构主义批判的基础上,建立了一个以中国人脸为中心的社会实践的创造性参与和立足转变的初步模型。和个性化的中国面孔实践模式的转变。研究得出的结论是,在中国背景下的社会建构主义者有双重研究议程。一方面,他们必须减少过度的共产主义,这会由于面子行为而破坏单个代理机构;另一方面,由于在资本,法律和技术方面急于为个人利益而急于放弃个人的面子行为,他们需要防止不受约束的个体代理对社区的冲击。它还考察了中国语境下对CQ的承受能力和约束,并确定了作者认为中国版本的社会建构主义与西方传播版本的社会建构主义之间的主要异同。考察,比较和对比表明,西方社会建构主义是对现代西方文化的建设性修改,比现代西方文化更接近中国文化。两种文化也有很多可以相互学习的地方。该研究从理论上暗示了东西方跨文化关系的光明前景,这是在东方和西方都有研究议程的社会建构主义者可以共同建构的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jia, Wenshan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.; Anthropology Cultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 285 p.
  • 总页数 285
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;民族学;人类学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号