首页> 外文学位 >Science in the brewery: Pure yeast culture and the transformation of brewing practices in Germany at the end of the 19th century.
【24h】

Science in the brewery: Pure yeast culture and the transformation of brewing practices in Germany at the end of the 19th century.

机译:啤酒科学:19世纪末,纯酵母文化和德国啤酒酿造方式的转变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the 19th century, the introduction of scientific methods and new technologies into the brewery transformed the practice of making beer. The use of steam engines, refrigeration systems, and standardized measuring devices marked a new era of industrial brewing. These changes also encompassed a new understanding of fermentation as a vital activity of the single-celled organism known as yeast. The biological theory of fermentation had direct implications for how brewers handled yeast and how they solved practical brewing problems such as spoiled beer.; Around 1880, a young brewing scientist named Emil Christian Hansen developed a new technique called ‘pure yeast culture’ as a remedy for spoiled beer. Hansen based his technique on the microbiological theories and laboratory methods of Pasteur, Koch, and other scientists. Yet he was also aware that the ultimate success of pure yeast culture in the brewery depended on its adoption by practicing brewers whose professional identity rested on traditional craft skills and artisanal knowledge.; The initial reactions of brewers to pure yeast culture were mixed. Many brewers recognized its benefits and readily adopted the new technique, but others remained skeptical that laboratory procedures should replace traditional practices. In Germany, this debate fell along regional lines. Bavarian brewers and brewing scientists associated with the Wissenschaftliche Station für Brauerei in Munich readily adopted Hansen's technique and quickly embarked on their own research program to expand its usefulness. In Berlin, however, pure yeast culture came under intense criticism for being too detached from the real needs of the practicing brewer. The leading proponent of this view was Max Delbrück, the director of the Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei in Berlin. As an alternative, Delbrück proposed his own ‘natural’ system of yeast culture that drew on traditional brewing practices rather than the ‘artificial’ methods of the laboratory.; The debate over pure yeast culture in Germany at the end of the 19th century highlights the importance of artisanal skills in the production and reception of scientific knowledge of brewing. It also exemplifies the conflicting attitudes of traditional artisans and laboratory scientists towards the process of industrialization and modernization.
机译:在19世纪,啤酒厂引入科学方法和新技术改变了啤酒的生产方式。蒸汽机,制冷系统和标准化测量设备的使用标志着工业酿造的新纪元。这些变化还包括对发酵的新认识,即发酵是被称为酵母的单细胞生物的重要活动。发酵的生物学理论直接影响啤酒酿造者如何处理酵母以及他们如何解决啤酒酿造等实际酿造问题。 1880年左右,一位名叫埃米尔·克里斯蒂安·汉森(Emil Christian Hansen)的年轻酿酒科学家开发了一种称为“纯酵母培养”的新技术,以作为变质啤酒的一种补救方法。汉森的技术基于巴斯德,科赫和其他科学家的微生物学理论和实验室方法。然而,他也意识到,纯酵母培养在啤酒厂中的最终成功取决于对啤酒酿造业的采用,这些啤酒酿造厂的专业身份取决于传统工艺技能和手工知识。酿造者对纯酵母培养物的初始反应被混合。许多啤酒厂认识到它的好处,并很快采用了这种新技术,但其他啤酒厂仍然怀疑实验室程序应取代传统做法。在德国,这场辩论是按照地区划分的。与慕尼黑啤酒厂Wissenschaftliche站相关的巴伐利亚啤酒厂和酿造科学家立即采用了汉森的技术,并迅速着手开展自己的研究计划以扩大其用途。然而,在柏林,纯酵母文化因过于脱离啤酒生产者的实际需求而受到强烈批评。该观点的主要支持者是柏林Versuchs- und LehranstaltfürBrauerei的董事MaxDelbrück。作为替代方案,德尔布吕克提出了自己的“天然”酵母培养体系,该体系借鉴了传统的酿造方法,而不是实验室的“人工”方法。 19世纪末,关于德国纯酵母文化的辩论凸显了手工技术在酿造和接收酿造科学知识方面的重要性。它还举例说明了传统工匠和实验室科学家对工业化和现代化进程的矛盾态度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ceccatti, John Simmons.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 History of Science.; History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学史;欧洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号