首页> 外文学位 >Trust and team building: A study comparing traditional and experiential team building methods in relation to trust development.
【24h】

Trust and team building: A study comparing traditional and experiential team building methods in relation to trust development.

机译:信任和团队建设:一项将传统和经验团队建设方法与信任发展进行比较的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Trust is the “glue” that holds teams together (Harrington-Mackin, 1994). With trust, teams function smoothly and efficiently by freely sharing knowledge, skills, and ideas among members. Without trust, teams are stifled; collective learning, knowledge sharing, creative problem solving, and process improvement is restricted (Argyris, 1999; Reina, 1999; Senge, 1990). Organizational learning theorists submit that the functioning quality of teams determines an organization's capacity to adapt to change, ultimately affecting their competitiveness in this era of rapidly changing, global competition (Watkins & Marsick, 1993).; Therefore, those organizations that have high-performing teams also possess greater organizational learning capacity over those that don't. By employing innovative and effective team development practices, organizations are more apt to tap individual and collective performance potential, consequently enhancing their competitive power (Phillips, 1999; Roland, Wagner, & Weigand, 1995).; This quasi-experimental investigation was designed to compare differences in trust scores (dependent variable) between experimental groups (independent variable) immediately following intervention (posttest) and again 30 days later (postposttest). Three groups were compared: (1) traditional team building—classroom discussion, (2) experiential team building—classroom discussion with innovative group activities, and (3) control—no team building. The Team Trust Scale (TTS) was used to measure trust outcomes, and an open-ended Team Building Questionnaire (TBQ) was used to gain insights on the overall team building process. The results of this study, via analyses of covariance (ANCOVA), indicated that experiential team building methods maintained a statistically significantly higher trust level than the control group over time when traditional team building methods did not.; This paper provides a detailed and comprehensive description and review of this investigation including history and theory of organizational, experiential, and team learning concepts; an overview of trust constructs relative to social and workplace relations and outcomes; research methods and design implemented; and interpretation and implications of the study's results.
机译:信任是将团队凝聚在一起的“胶水”(Harrington-Mackin,1994年)。有了信任,团队可以通过在成员之间自由共享知识,技能和想法来平稳高效地开展工作。没有信任,团队就被扼杀;集体学习,知识共享,创造性问题解决和过程改进受到限制(Argyris,1999; Reina,1999; Senge,1990)。组织学习理论家认为,团队的运作质量决定了组织适应变化的能力,最终影响了这个在瞬息万变的全球竞争时代中的竞争力(Watkins&Marsick,1993)。因此,拥有高绩效团队的组织比没有组织的组织具有更大的组织学习能力。通过采用创新和有效的团队发展实践,组织更易于发掘个人和集体绩效潜能,从而增强其竞争能力(Phillips,1999; Roland,Wagner和Weigand,1995)。进行这种准实验研究的目的是比较干预后(测试后)和30天后(测试后)在实验组(自变量)之间的信任评分(因变量)之间的差异。比较了三个小组:(1)传统团队建设-课堂讨论;(2)体验团队建设-带有创新小组活动的课堂讨论;以及(3)控制-无团队建设。团队信任量表(TTS)用于衡量信任结果,开放式团队建设问卷(TBQ)用于了解整个团队建设过程。通过协方差分析(ANCOVA),本研究的结果表明,与传统的团队建设方法相比,经验性团队建设方法在时间上保持着统计学上显着高于对照组的信任水平。本文提供了对该调查的详细而全面的描述和回顾,包括组织,体验和团队学习概念的历史和理论;相对于社会和工作场所关系及结果的信任结构概述;研究方法和设计得以实施;研究结果的解释和含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mendoza, Jesse Gil.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of New Mexico.;

  • 授予单位 The University of New Mexico.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Psychology Industrial.; Education Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;工业心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号