首页> 外文学位 >The effectiveness of cooperative learning as an instructional strategy to increase biological literacy and academic achievement in a large, nonmajors college biology class.
【24h】

The effectiveness of cooperative learning as an instructional strategy to increase biological literacy and academic achievement in a large, nonmajors college biology class.

机译:合作学习作为一种在大型非专业大学生物学课程中提高生物素养和学术成就的指导性策略的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cooperative learning may be defined as an active learning strategy in which students work together to create their knowledge interdependently to maximize their own and each other's learning (Aronson, Blaney, Stephens, Sikes, & Snapp, 1978; Johnson & Johnson, 1978; Kagan, 1988; Sharan & Sharan, 1976; Slavin, 1977). Six nonmajors biology lecture classes (N = 349) at a moderate sized southern university in the Fall 2002 semester participated in the study. One lecture class integrated daily cooperative group learning strategies throughout the semester; the other five classes were a continuum of direct lecture instructional practices.;The data collected to ascertain biological literacy was obtained using the Biology Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES) and the Texas high school Biology-End-of-Course Exam (BECE, Spring 2001) administered in a pre- and posttest design. The data on student achievement was determined by the final course grade as reported by the lecture instructor. Differential means were analyzed with a One-Way ANOVA. Comparing the cooperative with the direct lecture classes, there was a significant difference between the differential means of BSES Factor 3, application of biological concepts (F (5,343) = 3.737, p < .01), and BECE overall knowledge (F (5,343) = 12.455, p < .0005). There was no significant difference between BSES Factor 1, methods of biology (F (5, 343) =1.953, p > .05), and Factor 2, generalization to other sciences ( F (5, 343) = 3.351, p .05) and content (F (5, 343) = 1.156, p > .05) questions. There was no significant difference in academic achievement (F (5, 343) = 1.592, p > .05). Although the cooperative lecture class reported greater confidence in applying biology to other areas and overall biology knowledge, this study's results were not consistent with primary through postsecondary research related to cooperative learning, biological literacy, and academic achievement.
机译:合作学习可以定义为一种积极的学习策略,在这种策略中,学生可以相互合作以相互依赖地创建自己的知识,以最大化自己和彼此的学习能力(Aronson,Blaney,Stephens,Sikes和&Snapp,1978; Johnson&Johnson,1978; Kagan, 1988年; Sharan&Sharan,1976年; Slavin,1977年)。 2002年秋季学期,在一所中等规模的南部大学举办了六个非专业生物学讲座(N = 349)。一堂讲座课在整个学期中整合了日常合作小组学习策略;其他五节课是直接讲课教学实践的连续体。收集的用于确定生物素养的数据是使用生物自我效能量表(BSES)和德克萨斯高中生物课程结业考试(BECE,春季)获得的2001年)进行了前期和后期测试设计。关于学生成绩的数据由讲师报告的最终课程成绩决定。用单向方差分析分析差分均值。将合作社与直接讲课进行比较,BSES因素3的差异化方法,生物学概念的应用(F(5,343)= 3.737,p <.01)和BECE总体知识(F(5,343)之间存在显着差异。 = 12.455,p <.0005)。 BSES因子1的生物学方法(F(5,343)= 1.953,p> .05)和因子2推广至其他科学(F(5,343)= 3.351,p .05)之间没有显着差异)和内容(F(5,343)= 1.156,p> .05)问题。学业成绩无显着差异(F(5,343)= 1.592,p> .05)。尽管合作社讲课报告了将生物学应用于其他领域和整体生物学知识的更大信心,但该研究的结果与有关合作社学习,生物素养和学术成就的中学到中学后的研究结果并不一致。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sadler, Kim Cleary.;

  • 作者单位

    Tennessee State University.;

  • 授予单位 Tennessee State University.;
  • 学科 Curriculum development.;Higher education.;Science education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 117 p.
  • 总页数 117
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号