首页> 外文学位 >The selling of California: The Indians Claims Commission and the case of the Indians of California v. the United States.
【24h】

The selling of California: The Indians Claims Commission and the case of the Indians of California v. the United States.

机译:出售加利福尼亚州:印第安人索赔委员会和加利福尼亚印第安人诉美国一案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

n 1851 President Fillmore appointed three commissioners to conduct treaties with the Native peoples of California. The United States wanted California opened up for settlement, and eighteen treaties were completed with several tribes. Congress never ratified these treaties, but the Native peoples of California were dispossessed of their lands and relocated onto reservations. By the end of the nineteenth century the majority of land holdings and legal title held by the Native peoples of California belonged to others. The dilemmas of the Native peoples of California were brought to public notice during the 1870s and 1880s due to several humanitarian movements that became active during this time. This eventually led to the passage of the 1928 Jurisdictional Act, a federal law that provided for Congressional examination of the land title of the Native peoples of California. The Native peoples of California prevailed in this case, proving that they once owned the area that was included in the eighteen unratified treaties. The Indians Claims Commission Act was passed on August 13, 1946, that allowed for land claims to be filed against the federal government by native groups. Three groups from California filed before the ICC claiming to represent the Native peoples. These three claims were consolidated into one case that became the Indians of California. The ICC commission would hear this case, with notable scholars testifying for the California Indians and the government. The government would propose that the Native peoples did not use all of the land area, while the California Indians would refute this theory. The ICC found in favor of the Native peoples of California, with a settlement offered of
机译:1851年,菲尔莫尔(Fillmore)总统任命三名专员与加利福尼亚州的原住民进行条约。美国希望加利福尼亚开放其定居点,并与几个部落达成了18项条约。国会从未批准过这些条约,但是加利福尼亚的土著人民被剥夺了土地,被安置在保留地上。到19世纪末,加利福尼亚原住民拥有的大多数土地所有权和合法所有权属于他人。 1870年代和1880年代,由于几次人道主义运动在这一时期变得活跃起来,加利福尼亚州原住民的困境被公之于众。最终,这导致了1928年《管辖权法》的通过,该联邦法规定了国会对加利福尼亚原住民土地所有权的审查。加利福尼亚州的土著人民在这种情况下占了上风,证明他们曾经拥有十八个未批准条约所包括的地区。 1946年8月13日通过了《印第安人索赔委员会法》,该法案允许土著团体向联邦政府提起土地索赔。在国际刑事法院声称代表土著人民之前,来自加利福尼亚的三个团体提起诉讼。这三个主张合并为一个案子,成为加利福尼亚的印第安人。 ICC委员会将审理此案,著名学者为加利福尼亚印第安人和政府作证。政府会建议土著人民不要使用所有土地,而加利福尼亚印第安人会反驳这一理论。 ICC赞成加利福尼亚原住民,并提出了以下解决方案:

著录项

  • 作者

    Sanchez, Susan Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Riverside.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Riverside.;
  • 学科 American history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 258 p.
  • 总页数 258
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号