首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of predicted and actual shrinkage for short-fiber-reinforced materials.
【24h】

Comparison of predicted and actual shrinkage for short-fiber-reinforced materials.

机译:短纤维增强材料的预测收缩率与实际收缩率的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two linear shrinkage models, the residual strain (RS) and corrected in-mold residual stress (CRIMS) models, were evaluated for their ability to predict the shrinkage of 30% glass-filled nylon-6,6 and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Both models overpredicted the in-flow and near gate cross-flow linear shrinkage and underpredicted the cross-flow shrinkage at the end of fill. The difference between measured and predicted shrinkage, however, was same with the glass-filled material as with an unfilled polycarbonate used in a previous study. These linear shrinkage predictions were insensitive to the viscosity models, juncture loss coefficients, solidification temperatures, input flow rates, and input switchover positions, but were affected by changes in packing pressure. Volumetric shrinkage was far more sensitive to processing conditions, simulation inputs, and changes in the analysis type. Although fiber orientation predictions have shown reasonable agreement with experimental results, these shrinkage results suggest that fiber orientation has little effect on the overall shrinkage predictions for fiber filled materials.
机译:评估了两个线性收缩模型,即残余应变(RS)模型和校正的模内残余应力(CRIMS)模型,它们具有预测30%玻璃填充尼龙6,6和聚对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯的收缩率的能力( PBT)。两种模型都高估了入流和近浇口横流线性收缩率,而低估了填充结束时的横流收缩率。但是,玻璃填充材料的收缩率与预期收缩率之间的差异与先前研究中使用的未填充聚碳酸酯相同。这些线性收缩预测对粘度模型,接合点损耗系数,凝固温度,输入流量和输入切换位置不敏感,但受填充压力变化的影响。体积收缩对加工条件,模拟输入和分析类型的变化更为敏感。尽管纤维取向预测与实验结果显示出合理的一致性,但是这些收缩结果表明纤维取向对纤维填充材料的总体收缩预测影响很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号