首页> 外文学位 >College administrators as public servants: A Q methodological exploration.
【24h】

College administrators as public servants: A Q methodological exploration.

机译:高校行政人员担任公务员:Q方法论探索。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Public administration scholars have long been interested in the professional orientations of public sector executives. An important idea from the body of mainstream public administration theory is that of the "public service orientation," that is, the notion that public administrators strongly embrace a duty to serve the public interest. This professional orientation has been argued to underlie a host of attitudinal, motivational, affective, and behavioral differences between private executives and their public sector counterparts. The goal of the current project was to explore the public service orientation in the context of American college and university leadership through an analysis of administrative orientation. The study employed Q methodology as an intensive, mixed qualitative-quantitative approach that is well-suited to mapping persons' points of view. Thirty-seven senior college administrators were asked to rank a series of statements regarding the administrative values, motives, and attitudes that underlie their own subjective perspectives on administrative conduct. Analysis of the study's data proceeded in two stages: (1) the factor analysis and interpretation of the holistic administrative perspectives offered by participants and (2) a qualitative comparison of these perspectives to extant scholarly portrayals of the public service orientation. Results indicated the existence of two major perspectives among higher education administrators. Factor A (Societal Trusteeship) is fundamentally oriented toward the needs of external society, and expresses a willingness to leverage institutional resources to improve the human condition. Factor B (Organizational Stewardship), by contrast, is an internally-oriented perspective that places primary emphasis on institutional performance. Importantly, the factors are not dichotomous, and suggest a high degree of normative overlap in the professional orientations of college administrators. While the societal trusteeship perspective appears to represent a close approximation to the idealized public service orientation, traces of this orientation also are evident in the organizational stewardship viewpoint. In total, the study's findings underscore the conceptual complexity of the public service orientation.
机译:长期以来,公共管理学者一直对公共部门主管的职业定位感兴趣。主流公共行政理论中的一个重要思想是“公共服务取向”的思想,即公共行政管理者坚决拥护为公共利益服务的义务。有人认为这种职业取向是私人高管与公共部门对应人员之间态度,动机,情感和行为上的许多差异的基础。当前项目的目的是通过对行政管理取向的分析来探索美国大学和大学领导层背景下的公共服务取向。该研究采用Q方法作为一种强化的,混合的定性-定量方法,非常适合于绘制人们的观点。三十七名高级大学行政管理人员被要求对有关其行政行为主观观点的行政价值观,动机和态度进行一系列陈述。对研究数据的分析分两个阶段进行:(1)参与者提供的整体管理观点的因素分析和解释;(2)这些观点与现有的公共服务取向的学术描述的定性比较。结果表明,高等教育管理者中存在两个主要观点。因素A(社会托管)从根本上面向外部社会的需求,并表示愿意利用机构资源来改善人的状况。相比之下,因素B(组织管理)是一种内部导向的观点,主要侧重于机构绩效。重要的是,这些因素并非二分法,而是表明大学管理人员的专业方向存在高度的规范重叠。尽管社会托管的观点似乎与理想化的公共服务取向非常接近,但在组织管理观点中也明显可见这种取向的痕迹。总体而言,该研究结果强调了公共服务导向的概念复杂性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Palmer, Daniel James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Dakota.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Dakota.;
  • 学科 Education Higher Education Administration.;Political Science Public Administration.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 182 p.
  • 总页数 182
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号