首页> 外文学位 >The development of student metacognition and self-regulated learning in the classroom by monitoring learning strategies and response-certitude on assessments.
【24h】

The development of student metacognition and self-regulated learning in the classroom by monitoring learning strategies and response-certitude on assessments.

机译:通过监测学习策略和对评估的反应态度,在课堂上发展学生的元认知和自我调节学习。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated the development of student metacognition and self-regulated learning through the use of self-monitoring study schedules, with analysis of response certitude (RC) on test items as related to student selection of learning strategies. During the course of one school year, high school students (n = 80) in an elective life science course, Anatomy & Physiology for Health Careers, employed self-monitoring schedules of 15 different learning strategies on a weekly basis through the course of seven class units to determine the effectiveness of regular monitoring of study strategies on test scores. Students in the experimental group then compared response certitude ratings on test items to selection of learning strategies during each unit to determine the effectiveness of those strategies that they elected to use. Comparisons were made on student selection of strategy types (personal/cognitive, behavioral, or environmental) between the control and experimental groups throughout the year. Statistical analyses were conducted on the effect of self-monitoring as well as accuracy of response certitude on test items to test scores using four independent-samples t-tests and five Analysis of Covariance tests. Results indicated that students in the control group used a greater variety of strategies, but achieved lower means of test scores than the experimental group; indicating that the experimental group was more selective with strategy types and more effective in those methods applied. Statistical analyses revealed a significant increase in test scores in relation to RC accuracy, but did not establish significance in the application of self-monitoring schedules. There was no significant support for the hypotheses addressing self-monitoring schedules to student selection of types of strategies. In addition, there was no statistical significance in student RC ratings to student selection of specific types of learning strategies.
机译:这项研究通过使用自我监测学习时间表调查了学生元认知和自我调节学习的发展,并分析了与学生选择学习策略有关的测试项目的响应度(RC)。在一个学年的课程中,高中生(n = 80)参加了选修生命科学课程《健康职业的解剖学与生理学》,在七个班级的课程中,每周采用15种不同学习策略的自我监控时间表确定定期监控学习策略对考试成绩的有效性的单位。然后,实验组中的学生将测试项目的反应确定性等级与每个单元中学习策略的选择进行比较,以确定他们选择使用的那些策略的有效性。全年比较对照组和实验组学生在策略类型(个人/认知,行为或环境)方面的选择。使用四个独立样本t检验和五个协方差分析对自我监控的效果以及响应度对测试项目对测试分数的准确性进行统计分析。结果表明,对照组的学生使用了更多的策略,但测验分数却低于实验组。表明实验组对策略类型更具选择性,并且在那些应用的方法中更有效。统计分析表明,与RC准确性相关的测试分数显着提高,但在应用自我监测进度表方面没有显着意义。假设没有针对学生选择策略类型的自我监控时间表的假设提供重要支持。此外,对于学生选择特定类型的学习策略,RC评分没有统计学意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martens, Lynn R.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Education Educational Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 278 p.
  • 总页数 278
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;教育心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号