首页> 外文学位 >It Takes a Village to Raise a Child: Disentangling the Effects of Material and Social Deprivation on Early Childhood Development in the KFL&A Public Health Planning Area.
【24h】

It Takes a Village to Raise a Child: Disentangling the Effects of Material and Social Deprivation on Early Childhood Development in the KFL&A Public Health Planning Area.

机译:需要一个村庄来养育一个孩子:理解物质和社会剥夺对KFL&A公共卫生计划区儿童早期发展的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Life course literature states that early childhood development (ECD) can influence most aspects of health throughout the life-cycle. Canada ranked last among 25 wealthy nations in meeting ECD objectives. Fewer than 5% of children born have clinically detectable shortcomings in developmental health, increasing to 26% by school age with emerging socioeconomic associations. Understanding how social determinants of health (SDH) influence ECD at the household and neighbourhood scales would help identify conditions for optimal developmental outcomes.;The socioeconomic health gradient assumes that EDI scores will directly correlate to material and social deprivation. Social deprivation had a slightly greater impact than material deprivation on children's developmental vulnerability, with Q5 being the most vulnerable in all competencies. Surprisingly, emotional health and social competence were significant areas of vulnerability for children in Q1 and Q2. "Village effects" -- when social determinants at the neighbourhood level have protective effects on ECD despite material deprivation at the household level -- were present within the Q3 and Q4 groups for the domains of social competency and emotional health. While the highest proportions of early childhood developmental vulnerability are found within the most deprived households, the largest numbers of vulnerable children are spread throughout the middle-class in a variety of neighbourhoods.;Canadian policy should focus on mediating avoidable risks within this critical time to avoid future deleterious health effects and costs. Mapping the effects of SDH at the neighbourhood level generates knowledge that informs intersectoral action by policy makers to provide the supports needed to foster healthy children.;The effects of SDH on ECD in the Kingston, Ontario area were studied. SDH were classified via marginalization (ONMarg) and deprivation (Pampalon) indices. ECD was measured via 2006 Early Development Instrument (EDI) scores for children most at risk upon school entry (Grade One). The basic spatial unit of analysis was 2006 Census of Canada Dissemination Areas, subdivided into quintiles of deprivation (Q1 being the least deprived and Q5 the most). EDI results from each of the quintiles within the two indices were compared and then combined.
机译:生命历程文献指出,幼儿发展(ECD)可以影响整个生命周期中健康的大多数方面。在实现ECD目标方面,加拿大在25个富裕国家中排名倒数第二。不到5%的出生儿童在临床上可检测到发育健康方面的缺陷,随着学龄的增加,随着新兴的社会经济协会,这一比例上升到26%。了解健康的社会决定因素(SDH)如何在家庭和邻里范围内影响ECD,将有助于确定最佳发展结果的条件。;社会经济健康梯度假设EDI得分将直接与物质和社会匮乏相关。社会剥夺对儿童的发展脆弱性的影响比物质剥夺的影响要大一些,第五季度是所有能力中最脆弱的群体。令人惊讶的是,在第一季度和第二季度,情绪健康和社会能力是儿童脆弱性的重要方面。在第三和第四季度中,在社会能力和情绪健康领域,出现了“村庄效应”,即尽管在家庭层面物质匮乏,但在社区层面上的社会决定因素对儿童早期发展起了保护作用。虽然在最贫困的家庭中儿童早期发展脆弱性比例最高,但在各个社区中,中产阶级的儿童数量最多,分布在各个社区。;加拿大的政策应着重于在关键时期内调解可避免的风险,避免将来有害的健康影响和费用。在社区层面绘制SDH的影响图,就可以为决策者提供跨部门行动的信息,从而为养育健康儿童提供必要的支持。研究了SDH对安大略省金斯顿的ECD的影响。 SDH通过边缘化(ONMarg)和剥夺(Pampalon)指数进行分类。通过2006年早期发展工具(EDI)分数对入学时风险最高的儿童进行ECD评估(一年级)。分析的基本空间单位是2006年加拿大人口普查地区,细分为贫困的五分之一(第一季度被剥夺最少,第五季度被剥夺最多)。比较两个索引中每个五分位数的EDI结果,然后进行合并。

著录项

  • 作者

    Christmas, Candice M.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Geography.;Psychology Personality.;Health Sciences Public Health.;Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 164 p.
  • 总页数 164
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号