首页> 外文学位 >Retailer television advertising: Consumers' skepticism of informational vs. emotional ads.
【24h】

Retailer television advertising: Consumers' skepticism of informational vs. emotional ads.

机译:零售商电视广告:消费者对信息广告和情感广告的怀疑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The bombardment with ads that consumers face daily has led to increased Skepticism toward Advertising. This increased advertising costs billions of dollars, yet, the research has shown conflicting results (Stafford and Day 1995) (Obermiller and Spangenberg 1998) (Obermiller, Spangenberg and MacLachlan 2005) regarding which strategies work best for reducing the negative influence of Skepticism toward Advertising.;For over a decade, retailers have ranked ;The appeal type is a strategic decision that advertisers must make yet, the previous research has yielded conflicting results regarding whether an informational or emotional appeal is more favorably received by consumers. This research utilized a three-stage approach to investigate the different creative strategies used by retailers.;During the first stage, a content analysis of 179 retailer ads was conducted using the methodology suggested by (Kassarjian 1977). A modified matrix of the Informational/Transformational matrix proposed by Puto and Wells (1984) that exchanged emotional for transformational was tested.;Stage two confirmed the results of Stage one by testing four ads categorized by the judges. Participants evaluated the ads using the thinking/feeling scale by De Pelsmacker, Gueuns and Ackaert (2002).;Using an online panel of 802 participants, stage three tested the proposed model that included an interaction between the type of ad and the level of skepticism and its influence on attitudes toward the ad and advertiser as well as retail patronage intentions and perceived retailer credibility. Skepticism toward Advertising had been conceptualized as a moderator (Obermiller and Spangenberg 1998) but in this research which tested the model only the main effects were found to be significant and not the moderator.
机译:消费者每天都要面对广告的轰炸,导致人们对广告越来越怀疑。这样增加的广告费用达数十亿美元,但是研究显示出相互矛盾的结果(Stafford和Day 1995)(Obermiller和Spangenberg 1998)(Obermiller,Spangenberg和MacLachlan 2005),关于哪种策略最能减少怀疑论对广告的负面影响。;十多年来,零售商一直在排名;吸引力类型是广告商必须做出的一项战略决策,先前的研究在信息或情感吸引力是否更受消费者欢迎方面产生了矛盾的结果。这项研究采用了三个阶段的方法来调查零售商使用的不同创意策略。在第一阶段,使用(Kassarjian 1977)建议的方法对179个零售商的广告进行了内容分析。测试了由Puto和Wells(1984)提出的信息/转换矩阵的修改矩阵,该矩阵将情感转换为转换。第二阶段通过测试法官分类的四则广告,确认了第一阶段的结果。参与者使用De Pelsmacker,Gueuns和Ackaert(2002)的思维/感觉量表对广告进行了评估。使用一个由802名参与者组成的在线小组,第三阶段测试了所提议的模型,该模型包括广告类型与怀疑程度之间的相互作用。以及其对广告和广告客户的态度以及零售商的惠顾意图和零售商信誉度的影响。对广告的怀疑论已经被概念化为主持人(Obermiller and Spangenberg 1998),但是在对模型进行测试的这项研究中,仅发现主要影响是显着的而不是主持人。

著录项

  • 作者

    Parker, Janna Michelle.;

  • 作者单位

    Louisiana Tech University.;

  • 授予单位 Louisiana Tech University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Marketing.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号