首页> 外文学位 >Objective structured clinical examination in physical therapist education.
【24h】

Objective structured clinical examination in physical therapist education.

机译:物理治疗师教育中的客观结构化临床考试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. Many studies in the medical and nursing literature support the use of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for evaluation of clinical competence; however, only one study examines the OSCE in physical therapist education. The purpose of this research study was threefold: (1) To determine the reliability of an OSCE for physical therapist students; (2) To determine if physical therapist student performance altered with differing exam preparation methods; and (3) To examine physical therapist students' satisfaction with taking the OSCE with student-trained standardized patients (SPs) compared to nurse practitioner students' satisfaction with lay persons trained as SPs.; Method. Data was collected from 65 physical therapist students from two different physical therapist programs and 40 nurse practitioner students. The physical therapist students took an OSCE that utilized students trained as SPs, and the OSCE was considered their mid-term practical exam in a musculoskeletal course. The physical therapist students were randomized to a rubric exam preparation group and a non-rubric exam preparation group. The nurse practitioner students took an OSCE that utilized lay persons trained as SPs, and the OSCE was considered the final examination for a health assessment course. Upon completion of their respective OSCE, all students completed a post exam survey on their satisfaction with their SP experience.; Results. This study found that the interrater reliability among examiners was high for the total score given in the exam for all students (ICC=0.77). The internal consistency approached an acceptable level (Cronbach's alpha = 0.55) for the performance scores of the OSCE. The results of the 2X2 ANOVA that examined student performance between exam preparation groups indicated a significant interaction between the group assignment and program, F (1,191) = 12.96, p0.001. The results of the 2X2 ANOVA that examined the student satisfaction scores between the rubric and non-rubric groups were not significant. Lastly, the results of the ANOVA that examined the student satisfaction scores between lay persons and students trained as SPs indicated a significant difference between groups (p0.001).; Discussion/conclusion. The primary outcome of this research study provides evidence of a reliable tool that can potentially be used across physical therapist education programs. Second, physical therapist programs should consider exam preparation methods when implementing OSCE formatted exams into the curriculum. Lastly, although the student satisfaction with student-trained SPs appeared to be lower, the majority of students who interacted with student-trained SPs was either neutral or believed the SP encounter to be realistic, useful and challenging.
机译:背景。医学和护理文献中的许多研究都支持使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)来评估临床能力。然而,只有一项研究在物理治疗师教育中研究了欧安组织。这项研究的目的有三方面:(1)确定理疗师对OSCE的可靠性; (2)确定物理治疗师的学生表现是否因不同的考试准备方法而改变; (3)检验物理治疗师学生对接受学生培训的标准化患者(SP)参加OSCE的满意度与护士实践者学生对接受过SP培训的非专业人员的满意度之间的比较;方法。数据来自两个不同的物理治疗师计划的65名物理治疗师学生和40名护士专业的学生。物理治疗师的学生参加了OSCE,该培训人员接受了SP培训,并且OSCE被认为是他们在肌肉骨骼课程中的中期实践考试。物理治疗师的学生被随机分为一个红字考试准备组和一个非红字考试准备组。执业护士的学生参加了一个OSCE,该组织雇用了经过SP培训的非专业人员,并且OSCE被认为是健康评估课程的最后考试。在完成各自的欧安组织后,所有学生均完成了对SP经验满意度的考试后调查。结果。这项研究发现,对于所有学生,考试者在总分数中的信度高(ICC = 0.77)。对于OSCE的性能得分,内部一致性接近可接受的水平(Cronbach's alpha = 0.55)。 2X2方差分析的结果检查了考试准备组之间的学生表现,表明组分配与计划之间存在显着的相互作用,F(1,191)= 12.96,p <0.001。 2X2方差分析检查了红组和非红组之间的学生满意度得分的结果并不显着。最后,ANOVA检验了非专业人士和接受SP培训的学生之间的学生满意度得分的结果表明,各组之间存在显着差异(p <0.001)。讨论/结论。这项研究的主要成果提供了一种可靠的工具的证据,该工具可以在物理治疗师的教育计划中广泛使用。其次,物理治疗师计划在将OSCE格式的考试实施到课程中时应考虑考试准备方法。最后,尽管学生对学生培训的SP的满意度似乎较低,但大多数与学生培训的SP互动的学生要么是中立的,要么认为SP遇到的挑战是现实的,有用的和具有挑战性的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Swift, Marcie Camille.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.; Health Sciences Education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 154 p.
  • 总页数 154
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号