首页> 外文学位 >Collaboration among human service nonprofit organizations: Mapping formal and informal networks of exchange.
【24h】

Collaboration among human service nonprofit organizations: Mapping formal and informal networks of exchange.

机译:人类服务非营利组织之间的合作:映射正式和非正式的交流网络。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Much of the current debates in the social service delivery have focused on the blurring boundaries between three sectors---the nonprofit, business and public sector. Surprisingly no empirical research has been given to this phenomenon from macro and comparative perspectives. First contribution of the study to is the conceptual and methodological model to link organization and strategic management theory with network theory. The study calls this new framework as collaboration network. Second, this survey of 33 nonprofit organizations in the Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania uncovers the hidden patterns of collaboration between the sectors including empirical evidence of blurring boundaries. In order to reveal the hidden patterns of collaboration, the study adopts blockmodel from network analysis that is useful to reduce complex networks into concise and easily understandable forms. Major findings uncovered by network analysis are; (1) Network structures are different according to specific types of collaboration relationships. Network structures become less dense as the collaborative relationships intensify. While nonprofits do not have to spend much of their valuable resources such as time and money on maintaining informal or infrequent information sharing or work referral relations, nonprofits should commit themselves to maintaining intensive relations such as formal contract or joint program. In addition, the types of six network structures are different from each other. For example, while formal contract network is shaped as a cohesive subgroup structure, resource sharing network shows a central-periphery system. (2) When three sector organizations are participated in the work referral network, the social service system emerges. Three sectors play a unique role respectively---a sender for public agencies, a service provider for businesses. As a major actor in the social service field, nonprofits not only play these two roles, but also play a coordinating or broker role between three sectors. (3) When either of the business or public sector is introduced in the collaboration network, new network structures replace the network structure which is composed exclusively of nonprofits. For example, when the public sector is involved in the formal contract network, the network structure changes from a cohesive subgroup system to a hierarchy system.
机译:当前社会服务提供中的许多争论都集中在非营利,商业和公共部门这三个部门之间的界限模糊。令人惊讶的是,没有从宏观和比较的角度对此现象进行实证研究。该研究的第一个贡献是将组织和战略管理理论与网络理论联系起来的概念和方法模型。研究称此新框架为协作网络。其次,这项对宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡阿勒格尼县33个非营利组织的调查揭示了部门之间隐藏的合作模式,包括边界模糊的经验证据。为了揭示协作的隐藏模式,该研究采用了来自网络分析的模块模型,该模块模型有助于将复杂的网络简化为简洁易懂的形式。网络分析发现的主要发现是: (1)网络结构根据协作关系的特定类型而有所不同。随着协作关系的加强,网络结构变得不那么密集。尽管非营利组织不必花费大量时间和金钱来维持非正式或不频繁的信息共享或工作转介关系,但非营利组织应致力于维护紧密的关系,例如正式合同或联合计划。另外,六个网络结构的类型互不相同。例如,虽然正式合同网络被塑造为一个凝聚的子组结构,但资源共享网络却显示了一个中央外围系统。 (2)当三个部门的组织参与工作推荐网络时,社会服务系统应运而生。三个部门分别发挥着独特的作用-公共部门的发送者,企业的服务提供者。作为社会服务领域的主要参与者,非营利组织不仅扮演着这两个角色,而且还扮演着三个部门之间的协调或经纪人角色。 (3)当在协作网络中引入商业或公共部门时,新的网络结构将取代仅由非营利组织组成的网络结构。例如,当公共部门参与正式合同网络时,网络结构从凝聚的子组系统变为层次结构系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号