首页> 外文学位 >The Hausman test, and some alternatives, with heteroskedastic data.
【24h】

The Hausman test, and some alternatives, with heteroskedastic data.

机译:带有异方差数据的Hausman检验以及其他替代方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Hausman test is used in applied economic work as a test of misspecification. It is most commonly thought of (wrongly some would say) as a test of whether one or more explanatory variables in a regression model is endogenous. There are several versions of the test available with modern software, some of them suggesting opposite conclusions about the null hypothesis. We explore the size and power of the alternative tests to find the best option. Secondly, the usual Hausman contrast test requires one estimator to be efficient under the null hypothesis. If data are heteroskedastic, the least squares estimator is no longer efficient. Options for carrying out a Hausman-like test in this case include estimating an artificial regression and using robust standard errors, or bootstrapping the covariance matrix of the two estimators used in the contrast, or stacking moment conditions leading to two estimators and estimating them as a system. We examine these options in a Monte Carlo experiment. We conclude that in both these cases the preferred test is based on an artificial regression, perhaps using a robust covariance matrix estimator if heteroskedasticity is suspected. If instruments are weak (not highly correlated with the endogenous regressors), however, no test procedure is reliable. If the test is designed to choose between the least squares estimator and a consistent alternative, the least desirable test has some positive aspects. We also investigate the impact of various types of bootstrapping. Our results suggest that in large samples, wild (correcting for heteroskedasticity) bootstrapping is a slight improvement over asymptotics in models with weak instruments. Lastly, we consider another model where heteroskedasticity is present---the count data model. Our Monte Carlo experiment shows that the test using stacked moment conditions and the second round estimator has the best performance, but which could still be improved upon by bootstrapping.
机译:豪斯曼(Hausman)检验在应用经济工作中用作错位检验。人们最常认为(错误地说)这是对回归模型中一个或多个解释变量是否是内生的检验。现代软件提供了多种版本的测试,其中一些版本提出了关于原假设的相反结论。我们探索替代测试的大小和功能,以找到最佳选择。其次,通常的Hausman对比检验要求一个估计量在原假设下是有效的。如果数据是异方差的,则最小二乘估计器将不再有效。在这种情况下,进行类似Hausman检验的选项包括估算人工回归并使用稳健的标准误差,或者引导对比中使用的两个估算器的协方差矩阵,或者叠加导致两个估算器的矩量条件并将其作为系统。我们在蒙特卡洛实验中研究了这些选项。我们得出结论,在这两种情况下,首选测试均基于人工回归,如果怀疑存在异方差,则可能使用鲁棒的协方差矩阵估计器。但是,如果仪器较弱(与内源性回归指标不高度相关),则没有可靠的测试程序。如果测试被设计为在最小二乘估计和一致替代项之间进行选择,则最不期望的测试将具有某些积极方面。我们还将调查各种类型的引导的影响。我们的结果表明,在大样本中,在仪器较弱的模型中,自举(对异方差进行校正)自律性比渐近律略有改善。最后,我们考虑存在异方差的另一个模型-计数数据模型。我们的蒙特卡洛实验表明,使用叠加矩条件和第二轮估计量的测试具有最佳性能,但仍可以通过自举进行改进。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chmelarova, Viera.;

  • 作者单位

    Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.;

  • 授予单位 Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号