首页> 外文学位 >Tarrying with the transcendent: Forms of religious experience in twentieth-century literature.
【24h】

Tarrying with the transcendent: Forms of religious experience in twentieth-century literature.

机译:与先验者共度:20世纪文学中的宗教经验形式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation considers whether the postmodern become the postsecular. Slavoj Zizek and Alain Badiou have posed this question as they have challenged postmodern skepticism, yet Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida also in some sense map a religious countercurrent in contemporary intellectual life. I develop a literary and theoretical genealogy of the turn towards the transcendent through a series of interrelated readings that examine key works by the modernists E. M. Forster, T. S. Eliot, James Joyce, and by the contemporary writer, J. M. Coetzee.; My first chapter starts with Lionel Trilling's famous claim that Forster's literature is characterized by a "double turn," an ironizing device that produces skepticism in the face of religious belief. In a close reading of A Passage to India (1924), I argue, however, that Forster's "double turn" has the effect of undercutting not only affirmations of faith, but also---and more importantly---those of doubt.; In chapter two I challenge the standard critical account of Eliot that divides his career into two distinct and unconnected halves pre- and post-conversion. Focusing on Four Quartets, I demonstrate that Eliot recycles many of his key images, motifs, and devices in order to recast how his earlier work engages with dialectics of faith and doubt, a dialogue still central to the goals and techniques of modernism.; Chapter three takes up Joyce's Ulysses. Scholars have long recognized the debt that Joyce owes to The Divine Comedy, yet little attention is focused on the principal structuring device of Dante's poem: the sensus plenior (Latin, "fuller sense"). My chapter establishes that Dante's fourfold structure is one of the central organizing principles of Ulysses and explores how Joyce uses this device to move beyond a purely materialist account of reality.; In chapter four I turn my attention to J. M. Coetzee, a contemporary South African writer keenly aware of the modernist preoccupation with the transcendent. Fascinatingly, in his recent Elizabeth Costello (2003) Coetzee specifically refers to the foregoing texts I have analyzed in this dissertation, using the iconographic modernists (along with Kafka) to challenge a largely secularized account of twentieth-century literature and culture.
机译:本文考虑后现代是否成为世俗的。 Slavoj Zizek和Alain Badiou在挑战后现代怀疑论时提出了这个问题,但是从某种意义上说,伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)和雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)在某种意义上也反映了当代知识分子生活中的宗教逆流。我通过一系列相互关联的读物研究了转向超验的文学和理论谱系,这些读物审查了现代主义者E. M. Forster,T。S. Eliot,James Joyce和当代作家J. M. Coetzee的主要著作。我的第一章从莱昂内尔·特里林(Lionel Trilling)的著名主张开始,即福斯特的文学作品以“两次转向”为特征,这是一种熨烫设备,面对宗教信仰时会产生怀疑。但是,在仔细阅读《印度通行证》(1924年)时,我认为,福斯特的“两次转身”不仅削弱了对信仰的肯定,而且削弱了(更重要的是)这些怀疑。 ;在第二章中,我挑战了艾略特的标准批判性叙述,将他的职业生涯划分为转换前后的两个截然不同的两半。以四重奏为中心,我证明了艾略特回收了他的许多关键图像,图案和装置,以重塑他早期的作品如何与信仰和怀疑的辩证法结合,这种对话仍然是现代主义目标和技术的核心。第三章论述乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》。学者们早就认识到乔伊斯对《神曲》的欠债,但很少有人关注但丁诗歌的主要结构工具:感觉上的上乘者(拉丁语,“更全面”)。我的章节确立了但丁的四重结构是《尤利西斯》的主要组织原则之一,并探讨了乔伊斯如何利用这种手段超越纯粹的唯物主义对现实的理解。在第四章中,我将注意力转向当代的南非作家J. M. Coetzee,他敏锐地意识到了现代主义者对先验者的关注。令人着迷的是,库切(Coetzee)在他最近的伊丽莎白·科斯特洛(Elizabeth Costello)(2003)中特别提到了我在本文中分析过的上述文本,他们使用肖像学的现代主义者(以及卡夫卡)来挑战二十世纪文学和文化的世俗化描述。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roeschlein, Michael J.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.; Literature African.; Religion General.; Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 272 p.
  • 总页数 272
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;各国文学;宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号