首页> 外文学位 >Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom.
【24h】

Critical pedagogy and oppositional politics in education: Developing critical consciousness and building civil society in the classroom.

机译:批判教育学和对立政治教育:培养批判意识并在课堂上建立公民社会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation researches how education can help maintain democracy by enhancing civil society. Civil society is a network of autonomous organizations that prevent state domination of society. Civil society requires the participation of critically-minded individuals in civic activities. This study suggests that critical pedagogy is a teaching practice that supports the development of a vibrant civil society because it emphasizes social critique, community, resistance, and civic engagement. Furthermore, social justice schools have the capacity to be civil society organizations that temper state power even though they are not autonomous from the government; schools can be the civil society of education by preventing state domination of this institution.; Using ethnographic field methods of participant observation and interview, this study analyzes three diverse secondary schools in California as they struggle to implement social justice pedagogics like critical pedagogy and social justice praxis. As defined in this study, social justice teaching praxis fosters critical consciousness, social responsibility, identity formation, and the questioning of power in society. Social justice praxis is the culmination of three dimensions of framing social justice issues in classroom interactions. When praxis is successful, power dynamics between the teacher and the student are transcended in favor of constructing intersubjective knowledge about social justice. Such knowledge production positions students in the power structure based on their relationship to power and oppression. Framing social justice is really about positioning and repositioning students and teachers in the power structure while identifying their particular responsibilities to social justice action.; Data suggests that social justice praxis is necessary but not sufficient to engage in critical pedagogy. Students and teachers at all three schools attempt to create comprehensive social justice programs. Some of these programs facilitate critical pedagogy while others are confined to successes and failures in social justice praxis because students and/or teachers do not thoroughly question their positions in the power structure. Additional barriers to practicing critical pedagogy in classrooms include tensions between education as a mechanism for assimilation vs. transformation, school structure, pressures for standardization, the homogeneity vs. heterogeneity of the student population, teacher experience, and resistance by teachers and students.
机译:本文研究了教育如何通过增强公民社会来帮助维持民主。公民社会是自治组织的网络,它阻止国家对社会的统治。公民社会要求思想敏锐的个人参与公民活动。这项研究表明,批判教学法是一种教学实践,它支持充满活力的公民社会的发展,因为它强调社会批判,社区,抵抗和公民参与。此外,社会正义学校有能力成为公民社会组织,尽管它们并非独立于政府,但它们可以锻炼国家权力。通过防止国家对该机构的统治,学校可以成为教育的公民社会。本研究使用人种学领域的参与者观察和访谈方法,分析了加利福尼亚州三所不同的中学在努力实施社会正义教育学(如批判教育法和社会正义实践)时所面临的困难。正如本研究中所定义的那样,社会正义的教学实践可培养批判意识,社会责任,身份形成以及对社会权力的质疑。社会正义实践是在课堂互动中框架化社会正义问题的三个维度的顶点。当实践成功时,教师和学生之间的动力动力将被超越,而有利于构建关于社会正义的主体间知识。这种知识生产基于学生与权力和压迫的关系,将他们置于权力结构中。构筑社会正义实际上是关于在权力结构中定位和重新定位学生和教师,同时确定他们对社会正义行动的特殊责任。数据表明,实践社会正义是必要的,但不足以进行批判的教学法。三所学校的学生和老师都试图制定全面的社会正义计划。这些计划中的一些计划有助于批判性教学法,而另一些计划则局限于社会正义实践的成功与失败,因为学生和/或教师并未彻底质疑他们在权力结构中的地位。在课堂上实践批判教学法的其他障碍包括:教育作为同化与变革的机制之间的紧张关系,学校结构,标准化的压力,学生群体的同质性与异质性,教师经验以及师生的抵制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kravatz, Tanya Devra.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.; Sociology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号