首页> 外文学位 >Exploring elementary special educators' beliefs regarding the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards: A cross-sectional survey.
【24h】

Exploring elementary special educators' beliefs regarding the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards: A cross-sectional survey.

机译:探索基本特殊教育者对国家数学教师标准委员会的看法:横断面调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this quantitative study was to explore elementary special educators' beliefs regarding the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards. This study utilized survey methods to determine the differences and similarities in the beliefs of special educators who teach students with emotional disabilities and general educators teaching in the same school buildings. The survey was distributed to 39 special education teachers and 36 general education teachers within the same eight schools in one school district. Of those surveys distributed, 69% of general education teachers' returned the survey completed and 74% of special education teachers. The special education teachers were first identified as those who teach students with emotional disabilities in the self-contained setting; eight schools in this district had such classrooms. Then, the general education teachers were selected from those eight schools. The framework for this study was constructivism and belief systems (Rokeach, 1968). Constructivist theorists, Piaget, Vygotsky and Dewey shaped our understanding that learning is a process, moving from the concrete to the abstract; students must learn through interacting with the environment and questioning across subjects as well as with peers (Dewey, 1944; Lambert, et al., 1995). With respect to belief systems, Rokeach theorized that beliefs are connected to one another, form clusters and are altered when interacting with new experiences, situations and beliefs (Greene, 1971; Rokeach, 1968).; The results of this study indicated a lack of knowledge about the NCTM Standards by the special education teachers as compared to general education teachers. Results also showed that overall teacher beliefs are aligned with the NCTM Standards. Some teachers' beliefs differed regarding various NCTM Standards, particularly when considering reading and writing numbers symbolically and when considering mathematics as a process in which students absorb information and store it in easily retrievable fragments as a result of repeated practice and reinforcement. The number of mathematics methods courses taken also differed among teacher groups. Future recommendations are included for research and professional development.
机译:这项定量研究的目的是探索基本的特殊教育者对国家数学教师标准委员会的看法。这项研究使用调查方法来确定教有情感障碍学生的特殊教育者和在同一校舍教学的普通教育者在信念上的异同。该调查已分发给同一学区同一八所学校内的39名特殊教育教师和36名普通教育教师。在分发的这些调查中,完成调查的普通教育教师返回的调查占69%,特殊教育教师的调查返回了74%。特殊教育老师首先被确定为那些在自给自足的环境中教有情感障碍学生的老师;该地区有八所学校设有此类教室。然后,从那八所学校中选拔了普通教育教师。这项研究的框架是建构主义和信仰体系(Rokeach,1968)。建构主义理论家皮亚杰(Piaget),维果斯基(Vygotsky)和杜威(Dewey)塑造了我们的理解,即学习是一个过程,从具体到抽象。学生必须通过与环境互动和跨学科以及与同question的提问来学习(Dewey,1944; Lambert等,1995)。关于信仰体系,Rokeach提出了一种理论,即信念与新的经验,情况和信念互动时会相互联系,形成集群并发生变化(Greene,1971; Rokeach,1968)。这项研究的结果表明,与普通教育教师相比,特殊教育教师对NCTM标准缺乏了解。结果还表明,教师的整体信仰与NCTM标准保持一致。一些教师对各种NCTM标准的看法有所不同,尤其是在考虑象征性地读写数字以及将数学视为一种过程的过程中,在这种过程中,学生由于反复练习和强化而吸收信息并将其存储在易于检索的片段中。老师组之间所采取的数学方法课程的数量也有所不同。未来的建议包括在研究和专业发展中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Floyd, Carlyn E.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Education Special.; Education Mathematics.; Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 168 p.
  • 总页数 168
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 特殊教育;初等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号