首页> 外文学位 >Three essays on the production effects of decoupled payments: Do decoupled payments matter for acres and yields?
【24h】

Three essays on the production effects of decoupled payments: Do decoupled payments matter for acres and yields?

机译:关于脱钩支付的生产效应的三篇文章:脱钩支付对英亩和产量有影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Conventional wisdom suggests that if decoupled payments do not distort market incentives, they should not distort production or trade. But the literature has identified several potential "coupling" mechanisms that suggest theory and practice are not in accord. Using both estimation and simulation methods, we analyze the effect of decoupled payments on farmers' decisions in the presence of one such mechanism, credit constraints. Intuitively, as payments enhance the liquidity and/or the collateral of credit constrained farmers, additional investment in production is allowed to occur. We estimate the marginal effect of decoupled payments on total, owned, and pasture acres, and on acres of corn, sorghum, soybeans, and wheat and observe whether payments matter more for more leveraged farmers. Our ability to observe farms over time allows us to improve on the existing literature by controlling for farm-specific unobserved effects. In an effort to analyze the income stabilization aspect of these payments we further estimate their effect on farm household consumption expenditures. The significant acreage effects and insignificant marginal propensity to consume suggest payments are being not put to the policy makers' intended use. We also extend the existing literature by using simulation methods in an expected utility maximization framework to evaluate the effects of doubling the amount of payments received and of recently proposed tighter payment limits on the typical Kansas wheat farmer's acreage and borrowing decisions. While tighter limits do not appear to matter, the collateral boosting effect of payments allows farmers to put more acres into production. Finally, we estimate the ability of farm characteristics to explain differences in crop yield performance. Our results reveal the potential for decoupled payments to boost relative yields and give an unfair advantage to their recipients. This may become an issue in future WTO discussions over the distortionary effects of decoupled payments.
机译:传统观点认为,如果脱钩支付不扭曲市场激励措施,则不应扭曲生产或贸易。但是,文献已经确定了几种潜在的“耦合”机制,这些机制表明理论与实践不符。使用估计和模拟方法,我们在存在这种约束机制(信贷约束)的情况下分析了脱钩支付对农民决策的影响。凭直觉,由于付款增加了信贷约束农民的流动性和/或抵押品,因此可以进行生产方面的额外投资。我们估算了脱钩支付对总,自有和牧场英亩以及对玉米,高粱,大豆和小麦的英亩影响,并观察支付对更多有杠杆作用的农民是否更重要。我们随着时间的推移观察农场的能力使我们能够通过控制特定于农场的未观察到的影响来改进现有文献。为了分析这些付款的收入稳定方面,我们进一步估计了它们对农户家庭消费支出的影响。巨大的种植面积效应和很小的边际消费倾向表明,付款并未用于决策者的预期用途。我们还通过在预期效用最大化框架中使用模拟方法来扩展现有文献,以评估将收到的付款金额增加一倍以及最近提议的收紧付款限制对典型的堪萨斯州小麦农民的种植面积和借款决策的影响。尽管更严格的限制似乎无关紧要,但付款的附带担保效应使农民可以将更多的土地投入生产。最后,我们估计了农场特征解释作物产量表现差异的能力。我们的结果表明,解耦支付的潜力可以提高相对收益率,并给接收者带来不公平的优势。这可能在未来的WTO关于脱钩支付的扭曲效应的讨论中成为一个问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Girante, Maria Joana S.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 202 p.
  • 总页数 202
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号