【24h】

How a System Backfires: From a Redundancy Solution to Redundancy Problems in Security

机译:系统适得其反:从冗余解决方案到安全性冗余问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Increasing attention is being paid to reliability, safety, and security issues in social systems. Scott Sagan (2004) examined why more security forces (a redundancy solution) may produce less security (redundancy problems). In that paper, he discussed how the system could cause backfire in three major ways (i.e. "common mode error", "social shirking", and "overcompensation"). Using Sagan's hypotheses, I simulate and analyze a simplified and generic security system as more guards are added. Simulation results support two of the hypotheses, showing "common mode error" makes the system backfire, and "social shirking" creates inefficiency in the system as well as exacerbating the common mode error's effect. Simulation results show "overcompensation" has no effect on backfiring, but leads the system to a critical situation, in which it could easily be affected by "common mode error." The structure of the model and simulation results give some insights into developing appropriate security policies.
机译:人们越来越关注社会系统中的可靠性,安全性和安全性问题。 Scott Sagan(2004)研究了为什么更多的安全部队(冗余解决方案)可能产生更少的安全性(冗余问题)的原因。在那篇论文中,他讨论了系统如何通过三种主要方式(“共模错误”,“社交逃避”和“过度补偿”)造成逆火。使用Sagan的假设,随着增加了更多的警卫人员,我对简化的通用安全系统进行了仿真和分析。仿真结果支持两个假设,表明“共模误差”使系统适得其反,而“社会逃避”使系统效率低下,并加剧了共模误差的影响。仿真结果表明,“过度补偿”对回火没有影响,但会导致系统陷入严重状况,在这种情况下,“共模误差”很容易受到影响。模型的结构和仿真结果为开发适当的安全策略提供了一些见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号