首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Ninth international conference on civil and structural engineering computing >Analytic Modelling, Diagnostic and Change-Engineering Tools for Use by Management to Foster Learning in Construction Design Organisations
【24h】

Analytic Modelling, Diagnostic and Change-Engineering Tools for Use by Management to Foster Learning in Construction Design Organisations

机译:管理层使用的分析建模,诊断和变更工程工具,以促进建筑设计组织的学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The findings of our recent study LEAF 1(Learning from Experience- Applying systematic Feedback to improve the briefing process in construction) confirm that the construction industry faces a difficult task in order to overcome the pervasive, persistent and prevalent culture of resistance to learning from experience. Crucially even in those organisations where top management are committed to promoting a culture of learning as a key driver to making continuous improvements in business and constructional performance they are hampered by a lack of relevant and appropriate tools or mechanisms and the nature of learning contexts. This together with the need to disseminate the messages emanating from LEAF was instrumental in us developing a set of dedicated tools for use by management in order to engineer change and to foster learning from experience. rnThese tools build on the findings from LEAF, which confirm much of modern educational theory that procedures or instructions do not necessarily engineer change and there is need to emphasize learning rather than instructing activities. What is important is to deliver the message through settings such as seminars where participants are encouraged and helped to learn the message themselves. LEAF allowed us to develop an abstract generic model, which provides an analytical basis to assist organisations in understanding their particular situation. The model distinguishes what we describe as the three fundamental elements of learning – (IPA) ‘Intentions’, ‘Practices’ and ‘Aspirations’. ‘Intentions’ define ‘what the project teams are supposed to be doing?’ whereas an organisation’s actual ‘Practices’ are represented by ‘what the project teams are actually doing?’ The model links or contrasts intentions and practices from ‘Aspirations’ denoting ‘what the project teams would like to be doing?’
机译:我们最近的研究LEAF 1(从经验中学习-应用系统反馈来改善施工过程中的简报过程)的发现证实,建筑行业面临着艰巨的任务,以克服普遍存在的,持久的和普遍的抵制从经验中学习的文化。即使在那些高层管理人员致力于促进学习文化作为持续改进业务和建筑绩效的主要驱动力的组织中,它们也因缺乏相关和适当的工具或机制以及学习环境的性质而受到阻碍。这与传播LEAF发出的信息的需求一起,对我们开发一套专用于管理人员的工具起到了重要作用,以管理变革并促进从经验中学习。这些工具建立在LEAF的发现之上,该发现证实了现代教育理论的大部分内容,即程序或指令不一定能改变设计,并且需要强调学习而不是指导活动。重要的是通过研讨会等设置来传递信息,鼓励参与者自己学习并帮助他们学习信息。 LEAF使我们能够开发一个抽象的通用模型,该模型提供了分析基础,以帮助组织了解其特定情况。该模型区分了我们所说的学习的三个基本要素–(IPA)“意图”,“实践”和“愿望”。 “意图”定义为“项目团队应该做什么?”,而组织的实际“实践”以“项目团队实际上在做什么?”表示。该模型将“愿望”表示的意图和实践联系起来或形成对比。项目团队想做什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号