首页> 外文会议>Symposium on detection limits in air quality and environmental measurements >Impact of the Detection and Quantitation Limits on the Analytical Feasibility of Measuring the European Chemicals Agency Risk Assessment Committee's Recommendations for Occupational Exposure Limit Values for Nickel and Its Compounds in the Workplace
【24h】

Impact of the Detection and Quantitation Limits on the Analytical Feasibility of Measuring the European Chemicals Agency Risk Assessment Committee's Recommendations for Occupational Exposure Limit Values for Nickel and Its Compounds in the Workplace

机译:检测和定量限制对测量欧洲化学物质机构风险评估委员会的分析可行性的分析可行性,为镍及其化合物在工作场所的职业暴露限制值

获取原文

摘要

In March 2018, the European Chemicals Agency, Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) published its final opinion for nickel (Ni) and its compounds. The proposed values were 0.005 mg/m~3 for the respirable fraction for both Ni metal and Ni compounds and 0.03 mg/m~3 for the inhalable fraction for Ni compounds. Scientific recommendations for occupational exposure limit values (OELVs) are based on the risk to health, not on the analytical capability of the method for workplace air determination. Practically, however, the sampling and analytical sensitivity and accuracy at the proposed OELVs need to be considered. The selection of a suitable measurement procedure depends on the requirements as stated in applicable consensus standards, for example, EN 482. This standard states that every procedure should operate within the range of 0.1-2 times OELV. For workplace Ni determination, 24 methods were identified. Based on the candidate methods' limit of quantitation (LOQs), only 17% of the methods can measure as low as 10% of the recommended respirable OELV and 90% of the methods can measure as low as 10% of the proposed inhalable OELV. In addition, 19 European laboratories responded to a survey regarding the workplace air methods for Ni. Four laboratories responded with a nonworkplace air reference method, seven laboratories could not determine the respirable OELV, and one laboratory could not determine the inhalable OELV. The results of our study show that there is no consistency in the calculation and use of the LOQ, which makes it difficult for companies to comply with binding OELVs. Standards should clearly state what the LOQ values are for the specific analytes on which they act. Consensus also should be reached on the LOQ derivation and the importance of the specificity of the matrix (e.g., workplace air) in this calculation.
机译:2018年3月,欧洲化学物质机构,风险评估委员会(RAC)发表了镍(NI)及其化合物的终原舆论。对于Ni金属和Ni化合物的可吸入级分和0.03mg / m〜3的可吸入级分,所提出的值为0.005mg / m〜3,用于Ni化合物的可吸入部分。职业暴露限值(OELV)的科学建议基于对健康的风险,而不是工作场所空气测定方法的分析能力。然而,实际上,需要考虑所提出的oelv的采样和分析敏感性和准确性。合适的测量程序的选择取决于适用的共识标准中所述的要求,例如EN 482.本标准指出,每个程序应在0.1-2倍OELV的范围内运行。对于工作场所Ni测定,确定了24种方法。根据候选方法的定量限制(LOQ),只有17%的方法可以测量到10%的推荐可吸入OELV的10%,90%的方法可以测量低至10%的可吸入oelv。此外,19个欧洲实验室回应了关于NI的工作场所空气方法的调查。四个实验室用非工作场所空气参考方法响应,七个实验室无法确定可吸入的oelv,一个实验室无法确定可吸入的oelv。我们的研究结果表明,LOQ的计算和使用情况下没有一致性,这使得公司难以遵守约束的oelvs。标准应清楚地说明LOQ值适用于他们采取行动的特定分析物。也应达成共识,并达到LOQ推导以及该计算中矩阵(例如,工作场所空气)的特异性的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号