首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Escape to America: Adapting European Study for Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) Methods to the Desert Southwestern U.S.
【24h】

Escape to America: Adapting European Study for Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) Methods to the Desert Southwestern U.S.

机译:逃到美国:适应欧洲的空气污染效应队列研究(逃脱)方法到沙漠西南部美国。

获取原文

摘要

The influence of air pollution on respiratory illnesses is well-documented, however few long-running respiratory studies have measured air pollution at participant homes or other locations. To retrospectively predict air pollution exposures, various approaches have been taken, including dispersion modeling, geostatistical interpolation, and land use regression (LUR) modeling. LUR modeling as per the European Study for Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) has been used in >30 locations in Europe, but never in the US nor validated with values measured >10 years prior. In this study, we tested the ability of LUR models to predict air pollutant measures from nearly 30 years earlier in Tucson, AZ. Using ESCAPE sampling methods, the Tucson Air Pollution Study (TAPS) sampled NO2 in 40 homes and PM2.5 and PM10 in half of those homes for 3 two-week periods from 2015-2016 in Tucson, AZ. Using comparable sampling methods, the Pima County Workers Study (PCWS) measured N02 in 39 homes and PM2.5 and PM10 in 17 homes for 2 one-week periods in 1987 in Tucson, AZ. LUR models were developed for each pollutant in each dataset and internally validated with ESCAPE methods. Then, TAPS-based LUR models predicted PCWS pollutant levels. During internal validation, TAPS-based LUR models performed better than PCWS-based models: for TAPS, adjusted R2 values for NO2, PM2.5, and PM10 were 0.75, 0.55, and 0.68, respectively, versus, 0.47, 0.25, and 0.21 for PCWS. In retrospective prediction, adjusted R2 values (root-mean-square error) for TAPS-based LUR models for NO2, PM2.5, and PM10 were 0.37 (10.7 ppb), 0.70 (27.6 pg/m3), and 0.30 (17.3 pg/m3), respectively. While predictions for PM2.5 and PM10 levels had limited success, the N02 predictions were within the measured range but generally under-predicted (predicted vs. measured ranges: 2.83 - 8.41 vs. 5.17 - 24.8 ppb). Our project shows promise for using LUR to retrospectively model air pollution levels measured nearly 30 years earlier.
机译:空气污染对呼吸疾病的影响是详细的,然而,很少有呼吸道研究已经测量了参与者家庭或其他地点的空气污染。为了回顾性地预测空气污染暴露,已经采取了各种方法,包括分散建模,地质统计插值和土地利用回归(LUR)建模。 LUR建模根据欧洲的欧洲空气污染影响(逃脱)的研究已被用于欧洲> 30个地点,但在美国中从未验证也没有测量的价值> 10年之前。在这项研究中,我们测试了LUR模型在艾兹图森近30年来预测空气污染措施的能力。使用逃生采样方法,图森空气污染研究(TAPS)在2015 - 2016年在图克森,阿兹的2015-2016中的40个家庭和PM2.5和PM10分为PM10中的一半。使用可比较的采样方法,PIMA县工作人员研究(PCW)在1987年在Tucson,AZ的1987年在17个家庭中测量了39家Homes和PM2.5和PM10的PM10。 LUR模型是为每个数据集中的每个污染物开发的,内部验证了逃生方法。然后,基于水龙的LUR模型预测了PCWS污染物水平。在内部验证期间,基于水龙的LUR模型比PCWS的模型更好地执行:对于NO2,PM2.5和PM10的调节R2值分别为0.75,0.55和0.68,而不是0.47,0.25和0.21对于PCW。在回顾性预测,NO2,PM2.5和PM10的基于水龙的LUR模型(ToT-yps-Square误差)的调整后的R2值为0.37(10.7 ppb),0.70(27.6pg / m 3)和0.30(17.3pg分别为/ m3)。虽然PM2.5和PM10水平的预测成功有限,但N02预测在测量范围内,但通常预测(预测与测量范围:2.83 - 8.41与5.17-24.8 ppb)。我们的项目显示了利用LUR以回顾性地模型的近30年来估计的空气污染水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号