首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics;International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >An Evaluation of Two-Dimensional Digital Input Models for Mathematical Structure: Effects on Working Memory, Cognitive Load, and Efficiency
【24h】

An Evaluation of Two-Dimensional Digital Input Models for Mathematical Structure: Effects on Working Memory, Cognitive Load, and Efficiency

机译:数学结构二维数字输入模型的评估:对工作记忆,认知负荷和效率的影响

获取原文

摘要

Typesetting 2-dimensional mathematical notation can present challenges to users who rely upon WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) word processing editors, which allow for direct manipulation of text. These editors use various models to represent 2-dimensional mathematical structure within the 1-dimensional word processing environment. The 2-dimensional nature of mathematical notations manifests itself in a variety of ways, and we hypothesize that two distinct models, structure-based (Microsoft Word Equation Editor) and free-form (MC2: Mathematics Classroom Collaborator) handle different types of mathematical structure with varying degrees of success. To test this hypothesis, an eye-tracking study was conducted to compare how these two models affect task efficiency for mathematical "expert" and "novice" users, as well as working memory interference, and cognitive load. The study required users to transcribe mathematical expressions containing three types of structure: linear (1-dimensional), exponential, and rational (fractions). Handwriting was used as a control. Results showed superior performance by the structure-based model for the transcription of fractions, while the free-form model displayed ameliorated performance for the transcription of exponents. Handwriting was found to be significantly more efficient, but cognitive effects were inconclusive. Few differences were found with respect to user mathematical experience level. These findings show evidence that neither of these models is superior for the typesetting of all mathematics, but rather that features of each model are better equipped to handle different mathematical structures. Therefore, word processing editors can improve the facility of typesetting 2-dimensional mathematics by incorporating elements of both tested models to improve the overall user experience. Such optimization will ultimately facilitate the digital learning and communication of mathematical content.
机译:排版二维数学符号可能对依赖WYSIWYG(您所看到的内容是什么)字处理编辑器的用户呈现挑战,这允许直接操纵文本。这些编辑器使用各种模型来表示1维文字处理环境中的二维数学结构。数学符号的二维性质以各种方式表现出来,我们假设两个不同的模型,基于结构的(Microsoft Word公式编辑器)和自由形式(MC2:数学课堂协作者)处理不同类型的数学结构不同程度的成功。为了测试这一假设,进行了一种关注的研究,以比较这两种模型如何影响数学“专家”和“新手”用户的任务效率,以及工作记忆干扰和认知负载。该研究需要用户转换包含三种结构的数学表达式:线性(1维),指数和理性(分数)。手写被用作控制。结果表明,基于结构的级分的模型表现出卓越的性能,而自由形式模型显示了对指数转录的改善性能。发现手写是明显更有效的,但认知效果不确定。关于用户数学经验级别发现了很少的差异。这些调查结果显示了这些模型,这些模型中都不是排队所有数学的排列,而是每个模型的特征都更好地配备来处理不同的数学结构。因此,Word处理编辑器可以通过结合测试模型的元素来改进二维数学的设施来改善整体用户体验。这种优化将最终促进数学内容的数字学习和通信。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号