首页> 外文会议>IISL Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space;International Astronautical Congress >WHAT LEVEL OF DETAIL IN NATIONAL SPACE LEGISLATION IS IDEAL FOR THE HARMONIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL SPACE LAW?
【24h】

WHAT LEVEL OF DETAIL IN NATIONAL SPACE LEGISLATION IS IDEAL FOR THE HARMONIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SUCH LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL SPACE LAW?

机译:国家空间立法中有哪些细节是协调和执行此类立法和国际空间法的理想选择?

获取原文

摘要

Harmonization of national space legislation can have many benefits but can be difficult to achieve given competing priorities and different legal systems. The aspect of harmonization that this paper explores is the level of detail in national space legislation regarding compliance with international space law, importantly including the Outer Space Treaty (OST). While most national space legislation contains a general obligation on commercial entities to comply with international space law, i.e. a low-level or minimalistic harmonization, different wording and different scenarios can make such harmonization illusory without any transparency benefits to private parties and without advancing a coalescence of views around OST obligations. More detail in national space legislation regarding what the OST requires can assist in achieving more coalescence of views beyond reliance alone on diplomacy within the UN Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) and in other forms. This is true even when the detail included is on a point of significant disagreement among nations as to what the OST allows or requires as fault lines of disagreement can be made more transparent but competitive pressures can nevertheless push forward consensus. Recent legislation gives some indication that further detail of OST obligations in national space legislation may be trending upward. This is a positive development, and as the level of detail in broadly-agreed interpretations of the OST (gradually) grows, national legislation can be updated or corresponding national regulations can lay out those further details in a two-way, push-pull fashion.
机译:统一国家空间立法可能有许多好处,但可能难以实现竞争优先事项和不同的法律制度。统一的方面是,本文探讨的是关于遵守国际空间法的国家空间立法的细节水平,重要的是包括外层空间条约(OST)。虽然大多数国家空间立法载有关于商业实体的一般义务,以遵守国际空间法,即低水平或简约的协调,不同的措辞和不同的情景可以使私人缔约方的任何透明度福利,而不推进聚结会OST义务周围的观点。关于OST所需的国家空间立法有更多细节,可以帮助实现更远的人们在联合国和平利用外层空间(套管)和其他形式的外交内的外交方面的依赖。即使包括的细节是关于OST允许或需要的关于OST允许或需要的故障行为的重大分歧,也是如此,这是真实的,因为可以更加透明,但竞争压力可以推动达成共识。最近的立法提供了一些迹象表明,国家空间立法中的OST义务进一步细节可能是向上培训。这是一个积极的发展,并且随着对OST(逐渐)的广泛同意解释的细节水平,国家立法可以更新,或相应的国家法规可以以双向推动的方式阐述这些进一步的细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号