首页> 外文会议>International Session of Factors of Regional Extensive Development >Between the 'Adjustment Strategy' and the 'Balancing Strategy': Modern Foreign Policy of the South Caucasus States
【24h】

Between the 'Adjustment Strategy' and the 'Balancing Strategy': Modern Foreign Policy of the South Caucasus States

机译:“调整战略”与“平衡战略”之间:南高加索国家的现代外交政策

获取原文

摘要

The authors aim to analyze the modern foreign policies of the South Caucasus countries by applying conceptual approaches of neorealists (adjustment, balancing) in the context of changing international relations. The strategy developed in the period of bipolarity changed in the 1990-2000th when the small and average countries had an opportunity to raise the status on the international scene, reorient the foreign policy taking into account new realities. Each of the South Caucasus countries was inclined to choose this or that strategy, proceeding from foreign policy resources. For the political elite of Armenia, the main issue is the problem of ensuring foreign security. Armenia has chosen an adjustment strategy. The factors that influenced the are the lack of open logistics routes, dependence on Russian gas, dominance of Russian investments, a threat of an escalation of the Karabakh conflict. After the "velvet revolution", the elite of Armenia seeks to combine both strategies. The internal political factor influenced the choice of the policy aimed at joining the EU and the United States when the 2004 change in the elite dramatically changed the country's foreign policy. Azerbaijan with richer natural resources, outlets to the sea, developed logistic routes, a stable political elite, has chosen a balancing strategy which allows the country to successfully converge the interests of such major players as Russia, Turkey, the EU, Iran, the United States, China, and less influential actors performing their own national tasks.
机译:作者旨在通过在不断变化国际关系的背景下应用概念性主义者(调整,平衡)的概念方法来分析南高加索国家的现代外交政策。当小型和普通国家有机会提高国际现场的机会时,在一九十零年度发生了两次变化的战略,重新定位了外交政策,考虑到了新的现实。每个南高加索国家都倾向于选择或该战略,从外交政策资源进行。对于亚美尼亚的政治精英,主要问题是确保外国安全问题。亚美尼亚选择了调整策略。影响缺乏开放物流路线的因素,依赖俄罗斯天然气,俄罗斯投资的主导地位,是喀拉巴赫冲突升级的威胁。在“天鹅绒革命”之后,亚美尼亚精英试图结合两种策略。内部政治因素影响了2004年精英的改变大幅改变该国的外交政策时加入欧盟和美国的政策的选择。阿塞拜疆拥有丰富的自然资源,海外的网点,开发的后勤路线,稳定的政治精英,选择了一个平衡的战略,使得国家允许该国成功收敛到俄罗斯,土耳其,欧盟,伊朗,伊朗,曼联等主要参与者的利益国家,中国和不太有影响力的行动者表演了自己的国家任务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号