首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Law, Governance and Islamic Society >The Normative Analysis of Marriage Age After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XV/2017
【24h】

The Normative Analysis of Marriage Age After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XV/2017

机译:2017年第22 / Puu-XV / 2017年宪法法院判决后婚龄年龄的规范分析

获取原文

摘要

Marriage is a sacred event of mutual love between a woman and a man. Paragraph (1) in Article 7 of Law No. 1 of 1974 determines the minimum age of marriage, i.e. 16 for females and 19 for males. A constitutional review of the law against the 1945's Constitution was requested by three petitioners because they considered that the provision, especially in Article 7, paragraph (1), has disadvantaged them. This research used a normative juridical method to examine the verdicts in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22/PUU-XV/2017 and the minimum marriage age after the Constitutional Court Decision was issued. The research results showed that the Constitutional Court decided that paragraph (1) in Article 7 of Law No. 1 of 1974 is contrary to the 1945's Constitution, and it does not have legally binding power. The Constitutional Court requested the legislator to amend the law within three years. In conducting an amendment, they should consider several aspects, i.e. education, psychology, social, gender, population, regulation synchronization, human rights, husband and wife dignity, and other aspects.
机译:婚姻是一个女人和一个男人之间相互爱的神圣事件。 1974年第1条第7条第(1)条第(1)条确定了最低婚姻年龄,即女性和19名男性的19岁。三位申请者要求对法律审查法律,提出了三名请愿人,因为他们认为这项规定,特别是第7条第(1)条,仍处于不利地区。本研究采用了规范性法律方法来审查宪法法院判决号22 / Puu-XV / 2017号决定的判决和宪法法院决定后的最低婚姻年龄。研究结果表明,宪法法院决定了1974年第7条第7条第7条第(1)款与1945年的宪法相反,它没有具有法律约束力的权力。宪法法院要求立法机构在三年内修改法律。在进行修正案时,他们应该考虑几个方面,即教育,心理学,社会,性别,人口,监管同步,人权,丈夫和妻子尊严等方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号