首页> 外文会议>International Conference LUMEN >How Do We Train Today's Children? A Criticism of the Opposition Rational Thinking Symbolic Thinking
【24h】

How Do We Train Today's Children? A Criticism of the Opposition Rational Thinking Symbolic Thinking

机译:我们如何培养今天的孩子?对反对派理性思维象征思维的批判

获取原文

摘要

Starting with Galileo and Newton, an immanentist paradigm was enforced in the European culture, consisting in the abolition of the transcendence from the scope of scientific concerns; the new paradigm will lead to the birth of the modern sciences of nature. In this paper we shall focus on the way in which the prescribed ideal of rationality will generate a new ideal of knowledge, impacting all the others ideals - social, moral and political. The ideal of rationality proper to modernity can be summarized in the equation rational knowledge = unconditioned intelligibility. This equation comprises the idea that an utterance is rational only if it has a universally accessible meaning, if it is intelligible as to allow the control and, implicitly, if it reaches the inter-subjective consensus. Such requirements of rationality function in mathematics and in the mathematized sciences, but in other domains (philosophy, arts, religion) they are loosened, have another degree of importance or are sacrificed in favor of other values. For instance in poetry, universal accessibility, consensus and uniformity are avoided, being considered indicators of failure and not of success; the ineffable, the eremitism and the uniqueness are preferred in exchange.
机译:从伽利略和牛顿开始,一个内蒙斯主义范式在欧洲文化中强制执行,以废除科学关注范围的超越;新的范式将导致现代自然科学的诞生。在本文中,我们将重点关注规定理性的理想将产生新的知识理想,影响所有其他理想的理想 - 社会,道德和政治。可以在等式理性知识中总结对现代性合理性适当的理想=无条件的可懂度。这种等式包括唯一如果它具有普遍访问的含义,则表示话语是理性的想法,如果允许控制并且隐含地,如果它达到主观间共识。在数学和数学化科学中的理性功能的这种要求,但在其他域名(哲学,艺术,宗教)中,它们被松动,具有另一种程度的重要性,或者被牺牲支持其他价值观。例如,在诗歌中,避免了普遍的可访问性,共识和统一性,被视为失败的指标而不是成功的指标;在交换中优选不可言论的,爱因特主义和唯一性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号