首页> 外文会议>PEGS >Comparison of Phage ELISA and RISE Detection Methods for Analysis of Phage Displayed Antibody Fragment
【24h】

Comparison of Phage ELISA and RISE Detection Methods for Analysis of Phage Displayed Antibody Fragment

机译:噬菌体ELISA的比较和噬菌体分析抗体片段分析的研究

获取原文

摘要

Selection for leading candidates is unavoidable during discovery of new antibodies. Since the first reports on application of filamentous phage fusions for protein display and selection the phage display method became the most popular way for discovering new antibodies. During this procedure mRNA isolated from either B-cells or splenocytes serves as a template for amplification of cDNA of antibody variable fragments. The recombinant fragments are usually cloned as single chain variable fragments (scFv) which can be expressed as a fusion with the phage coat protein on the surface of the phage. Naturally, the abilities of the recombinant scFv to bind the antigens of interest need to be confirmed. Many protocols recommend ELISA with antibody-displaying-phages preparation for such assessment (here reported as standard Phage ELISA), however a quicker solution, named RISE detection, has been also described [Ref.1]. The cDNA sequence encoding scFv fragment from monoclonal anti-H5 HA antibody (mAb) was cloned into phagemid pSEX81 vector and analysed by standard Phage ELISA and RISE detection. In both methods, phages exposing scFv on gpIII capsid protein were incubated with BSA or one of the H5 hemagglutinin (HA) from the following influenza strains: "Vietnam" (A/Vietnam/1203/2004(H5N1)), "Qinghai" (A/Bar headed goose/Qinghai/12/05 (H5N1)) or "Poland" (A/swan/Poland/305-135V08/2006(H5N1)). The first two HA variants were full-length, while the third was truncated and contain only the H1 region (17-340) of HA. RISE detection method resulted in the higher OD450 values than the standard Phage ELISA method. Those values were: 3.34±0.01 (mean±SD) for short form of "Poland" HA (17-340), 4.02±0.03 for "Qinghai" and 0.58±0.05 for "Vietnam", while the background OD450 (for BSA) was 0.31±0.04. Subsequent experiments indicated that the results of RISE detection are quite variable and that both, the concentration of phages exposing scFv and the time of incubation have impact on these results. Advantages and disadvantages of both methods (RISE detetion and standard Phage ELISA) are discussed.
机译:选择为主导的候选人是新抗体的发现过程中不可避免的。由于在丝状噬菌体上的融合蛋白展示和选择的应用程序的第一个报告的噬菌体展示方法成为发现新的抗体最流行的方式。在此过程中的mRNA从任一B细胞或分离脾细胞用作抗体可变片段的cDNA的扩增的模板。该重组片段被克隆通常作为可被表达为与噬菌体的表面上的噬菌体外壳蛋白的融合的单链可变片段(scFv)。当然,重组scFv的能力结合目标需要抗原得到证实。许多协议建议ELISA有用于此类评估抗体显示噬菌体制剂(此处报道为标准噬菌体ELISA),然而更快溶液,命名上升检测,一直还描述[给定]。从单克隆抗H5 HA抗体(mAb)编码scFv片段的cDNA序列克隆到噬菌粒载体pSEX81并通过标准噬菌体ELISA和上升检测进行分析。在两种方法中,噬菌体上GPIII衣壳蛋白暴露的scFv与BSA一起温育或从下面的流感病毒株的H5血凝素(HA)中的一个:“越南”(A /越南/ 1203/2004(H5N1)),“青海”( A /斑头雁/青海/ 12/05(H5N1))或 “波兰”(A /天鹅/波兰/ 305-135V08 / 2006(H5N1))。前两个HA的变体是全长,而第三个被截​​断,并且仅包含HA的H1区(17-340)。 RISE检测方法导致比标准的噬菌体ELISA方法更高的OD450值。这些值分别为:3.34±0.01(平均值±SD)为 “波兰” HA短形式(17-340),4.02±0.03 “青海” 和 “越南” 0.58±0.05,而背景OD450(对于BSA)为0.31±0.04。随后的实验表明,上升检测的结果是相当可变的,并且这两个,噬菌体暴露scFv的浓度和温育时间对这些结果的影响。优点和这两种方法(RISE detetion和标准噬菌体ELISA)的缺点进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号