首页> 外文会议>European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics Conference >Managing nature parks as an ethical challenge: a proposal for a practical tool to identify fundamental questions
【24h】

Managing nature parks as an ethical challenge: a proposal for a practical tool to identify fundamental questions

机译:管理自然公园作为道德挑战:一个识别基本问题的实用工具的建议

获取原文

摘要

In 2010 the Report of the second International Commission on Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (OVP) was published. This international committee evaluated the management of one of the largest wetland reserves in the Netherlands. The results of this evaluation were of high public interest, because the OVP is a controversially debated topic in the Netherlands. This debate has mainly resulted from the introduction of a number of large herbivores to this area, such as Heck cattle, konik horses, and red deer, to maintain short grassland for grazing by geese. This measure had been taken as part of the initial management style of minimal intervention in the OVP, in order to allow 'natural ecological processes to operate' within the area. However, thisnon-intervention policy elicited a fierce debate on our duty of care towards these animals, when the harsh winter of 2009/2010 resulted in an unusually high winter-mortality among large herbivores. Are these animals to be considered part of nature, withanimals suffering and dying by starvation as a part of natural processes ? Or are they to be treated as kept animals towards which we have direct duties to prevent harm and suffering ? On top of this problem, the question arises whether one should assessthese dilemmas from the perspective of the individual animal or from a population-oriented perspective. Up until recently, these questions were - at the level of policy - mainly discussed as rather technical issues that demand further ecological expertise or input from veterinary and animal sciences to be solved. The ICM02 evaluation explicitly tried to include the moral dimensions in their scientific evaluation. In this paper we present the framework that has been used in order to explicate and structure the ethical questions that play a central role in the management of the OVP. This framework offers a tool for practical ethical deliberation and aims to provide room for fundamental ethical presumptions and moral ideals.
机译:2010年,第二届国际管理奥斯塔德斯普拉斯(OVP)委员会第二委员会报告发表。本国际委员会评估了荷兰最大的湿地储备之一的管理。该评估的结果具有很高的公共利益,因为OVP是荷兰有争议的辩论主题。这场辩论主要是引入这一领域的许多大型食草动物,如哎呀牛,康米克马和红鹿,以维持鹅牧草的短草原。这一措施被认为是OVP中最小化干预的初始管理风格的一部分,以便在该地区内的“自然生态过程运营”。然而,当2009/2010的严厉冬天导致大型食草动物中的冬季死亡率异常高的冬季死亡率时,这项干预政策引发了对我们对这些动物的关注义务的激烈辩论。这些动物是否被认为是自然的一部分,随着饥饿作为自然过程的一部分,患有患有和死亡?或者他们被视为保存的动物,我们有直接职责,以防止伤害和痛苦?在这个问题之上,问题出现了一个人应该从个体动物的角度评估困境或从人口导向的角度来评估困境。直到最近,这些问题是 - 在政策水平 - 主要讨论的是,较不适用于兽医和动物科学的进一步生态专业知识或投入才能解决的技术问题。 ICM02评估明确试图在科学评估中包括道德维度。在本文中,我们提出了已经使用的框架,以便宣传和构建在OVP管理中发挥着核心作用的道德问题。该框架为实际道德审议提供了一种工具,旨在为基本的道德推定和道德理想提供空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号