首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom >Reconstruction of the Completion of Presidential Election Dispute by Progressive Law Approach
【24h】

Reconstruction of the Completion of Presidential Election Dispute by Progressive Law Approach

机译:通过进步法方法重建总统选举争端的重建

获取原文

摘要

The implementation of elections must refer to the principles of honesty and justice The occurrence of violations in a systematic and massive structure has given a dominant position. This dominant position is the main cause that influences vote acquisition. Thus, determining the existence of electoral fraud must be seen from the existence of structured and systematic actions in the form of a dominant position that results in massive vote acquisition. The dominant position is very decisive in terms of proving electoral fraud qualitatively. The massive vote acquisition is resultant. Referring to the progressive law paradigm, related to the violation of the Presidential Election which is in TSM, the approach is to ensure the existence of a causality relationship between the dominant position and illegal vote acquisition. So it is a qualitative approach. As long as it can be proven that there is a correspondence between systematically structured actions that given a dominant position, then the results of massive fraud by itself can be easily proven.
机译:选举的实施必须提到诚实和正义的原则,在系统和巨大的结构中发生违规行为的发生占主导地位。这种主导地位是影响投票收购的主要原因。因此,必须从存在巨大投票的形式的结构化和系统行动的存在和系统行动的存在中确定存在选举欺诈的存在。在定性地证明选举欺诈方面,主导地位非常果断。巨大的投票收购是结果。参考进步法范式,与违反在TSM的总统选举有关的情况下,该方法是确保在主导地位与非法投票收购之间存在因果关系。所以这是一种定性的方法。只要可以证明,在给出主导地位的系统结构化的动作之间存在对应关系,那么就可以容易地证明了本身的大规模欺诈的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号