首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Energy and Mining Law >Change of Mining Business Working Agreements into Special Mining Business Licenses Under the Indonesian Mining Law
【24h】

Change of Mining Business Working Agreements into Special Mining Business Licenses Under the Indonesian Mining Law

机译:根据印度尼西亚采矿法将采矿业务工作协议的矿业业务协议变为特殊采矿业务许可证

获取原文

摘要

The creation of Law Number 4 of Year 2009 on the Mining of Minerals and Coal (Indonesia Mining Law) has caused changes to occur in Mining Business Working agreement, turning them into Special Mining Business Licenses, which is quite significant and has brought up several issues. Several of these changes include, among others, forbidding companies who have Working agreement to conduct exports of concentrates, instead of requiring them to perform enrichment first; changes in the schema of tax obligations and royalties that must be paid by the company, wherein the company must follow general tax regulations that apply in Indonesia; changes in the areas of mining operations, becoming more restricted than before; and changes in the position of relationships of the company and the government. These changes have raised quite serious reactions from several investors, in which PT Freeport Indonesia can be taken as an example. PT Freeport Indonesia has harshly reacted by rejecting the change from Working Agreements into Business Licenses and accusing Indonesia of having defaulted because of violating the principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda and will file a law suit through international arbitration. Meanwhile, Indonesia stands firm that it has the authority to regulate policies and politics within the country Indonesia has provided several options regarding the changes in policy and adequate time to comply as a result of the enforcement of the Indonesia Mining Law.
机译:2009年矿产和煤炭矿业(印度尼西亚采矿法)的法律规定的2009年第4次造成了更改,以进行采矿业务协议,将其转化为特殊采矿业务许可证,这是非常重要的,并提出了几个问题。这些变化中的一些包括禁止有努力行动集中权的公司的公司,而不是要求他们首先进行丰富;本公司必须支付的税务义务和特许权使用费的变化,其中公司必须遵循适用于印度尼西亚的一般税务规定;采矿业务领域的变化,比以前更受限制;以及公司与政府关系的变化。这些变化从几个投资者提出了相当严重的反应,其中PT自由港印度尼西亚可以作为一个例子。 PT自由港印度尼西亚通过拒绝从工作协议转变为商业许可证的变化并指责违约的印度尼西亚因违反PACTA SONT Servanda原则而指责印度尼西亚而受到严厉地反应,并将通过国际仲裁提出法律诉讼。与此同时,印度尼西亚坚定地坚定,它有权规范国内印度尼西亚的政策和政治的政策和政治,该备选方案提供了关于政策的变化和充足的时间遵守印度尼西亚采矿法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号