首页> 外文会议>Annual Cobference of The New^Zealand^Plant^Protection^Society >Assessing the 'user-friendliness' of biopesticides and their conventional pesticide counterparts: A 'proof-of concept' framework for comparing pesticide groups
【24h】

Assessing the 'user-friendliness' of biopesticides and their conventional pesticide counterparts: A 'proof-of concept' framework for comparing pesticide groups

机译:评估生物农药的“用户友好性”及其常规农药同行:比较农药群体的“概念证明”框架

获取原文

摘要

Biopesticides have a number of positive attributes compared with conventional pesticides but direct comparisons are difficult to achieve objectively. Therefore, an indexing method was developed and used to compare the user-convenience and flexibilityof spray-applied biopesticides commercially available in the New Zealand with similar conventional pesticides. Relative efficacy was not assessed. Biopesticides scored higher than conventional pesticides when all parameters were considered, particularlyfor the major fruit crops. Biopesticides had significantly shorter withholding periods, required less resistance management, seldom needed an approved handler, and were registered for more crops than conventional pesticides. However, they were less compatible with other products and some required special storage conditions. There was little difference between the two groups regarding bee toxicity, target range and adjuvant requirements. The methodology used here could potentially be used to compare anyindividual pesticides or pesticide groups pertaining to a particular measure of interest.
机译:与常规农药相比,生物农药具有许多阳性属性,但难以客观地实现直接比较。因此,开发了一种索引方法并用于比较用户 - 在新西兰商购的喷涂生物农药的便利性和灵活性,其具有类似的常规农药。没有评估相对疗效。当考虑所有参数时,生物特产药均得分高于常规农药,特别是对于主要的水果作物。生物农药扣留期明显较短,需要较少的阻力管理,很少需要批准的处理程序,并为更多作物注册而不是传统农药。但是,它们与其他产品兼容,以及一些所需的特殊储存条件。两组关于蜜蜂毒性,目标范围和佐剂要求之间几乎没有差异。这里使用的方法可能用于比较与特定兴趣衡量标准有关的任何形状的杀虫剂或农药组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号