首页> 外文会议>SAE World Congress Experience >Responses of Rear Seat ATDs in Frontal Impact Sled Tests: Evaluation of Two Seat Belt Configurations
【24h】

Responses of Rear Seat ATDs in Frontal Impact Sled Tests: Evaluation of Two Seat Belt Configurations

机译:前排座椅ATDS在正面影响SLED测试中的反应:评估两个安全带配置

获取原文

摘要

Sled tests simulating full-frontal rigid barrier impact were conducted using the Hybrid III 5th female and the 50th male anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). The ATDs were positioned in the outboard rear seat of a generic small car environment. Two belt configurations were used: 1) a standard belt with no load limiter or pre-tensioner and 2) a seatbelt with a 4.5 kN load-limiting retractor with a stop function and a retractor pre-tensioner (LL-PT). In the current study, the LL-PT belt system reduced the peak responses of both ATDs. Probabilities of serious-to-fatal injuries (AIS3+), based on the ATDs peak responses, were calculated using the risk curves in NHTSA’s December 2015 Request for Comments (RFC) proposing changes to the United States New Car Assessment Program (US-NCAP). Those probabilities were compared to the injury rates (IRs) observed in the field on point estimate basis. The injuries predicted by the risk curves over-predicted the injury rates in the field irrespective of the occupant size, speed, and restraint type evaluated.
机译:使用Hybrid III第5雌性和第50次雄性拟人检测装置(ATDS)来进行模拟全前刚性屏障冲击的橇试验。 ATDS定位在通用小型汽车环境的舷外后座。使用两个带配置:1)一个没有负载限制器或预张紧器的标准带和2)带4.5KN的带有4.5kN的载荷限制牵开器的安全带,具有止动功能和牵开器预张紧器(LL-PT)。在目前的研究中,LL-PT皮带系统降低了ATDS的峰值响应。根据ATDS峰值响应的基于ATDS峰值响应的严重致命伤害(AIS3 +)的概率是使用NHTSA 2015年12月的意见(RFC)提出对美国新车评估计划(US-NCAP)的改变的意见(RFC)的风险曲线计算。将这些概率与在估计基础上观察到的领域中观察到的伤害率(IR)进行比较。风险曲线预测的伤害过度预测了场上的伤害率,而不管乘员大小,速度和克制型如何评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号