首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education >Rethinking the Scientific Integrity of Young College Teachers: A Study of the Retracted Publications from Journals
【24h】

Rethinking the Scientific Integrity of Young College Teachers: A Study of the Retracted Publications from Journals

机译:重新思考年轻大学教师的科学诚信:从期刊撤回出版物的研究

获取原文

摘要

Scientific integrity emphasizes teachers' innovation, self-restraint and self-development. However, pushed by the "publish or perish" norm and challenging evaluation regulations, teachers and researchers need more publications. Due to the high pressure, some teachers would risk their reputation and integrity and be reduced to committing academic fraud or misconduct in their researches or published articles. The direct possible consequence would be retractions of some published articles by some journals. In this paper, focusing on the research question "How to Set the Bottom Line of Scientific Integrity for Young College Teachers?", an analysis of the retracted publications was conducted to evaluate the status quo of academic fraud. The principal methods applied in our research are literature analysis. According to the findings, reasons for retractions by journals are mainly misconduct accounting for more than 70% (including fraud, fabrication, plagiarism, faked peer review, duplicate publication, no permission from institutions or researchers), as well as error (honest/administrative error), etc. Rethinking the retractions would help to offer suggestions in improving the academic level of young teachers and setting up a bottom line of scientific research, which can promote the progress of science and technology, create a good academic environment, and then contribute to the construction of a healthy and scientific education system.
机译:科学诚信强调教师的创新,自我克制和自我发展。然而,被“公布或灭亡”规范和挑战性评估法规,教师和研究人员都需要更多的出版物。由于高压,一些教师会冒他们的声誉和诚信,并减少到犯下他们的研究或发表的文章中的学术欺诈或不当行为。直接可能的后果将是某些期刊的一些公布文章的撤回。在本文中,重点关注研究问题“如何为年轻大学教师设定科学诚信的底线?”,进行了缩回出版物的分析,以评估学术欺诈的现状。在我们的研究中应用的主要方法是文献分析。根据调查结果,期刊的撤回原因主要是误导占70%以上的误导(包括欺诈,制作,抄袭,伪身份审查,重复出版,机构或研究人员的许可)以及误差(诚实/行政误差)等重新思考仲裁将有助于提出改善年轻教师的学术水平并建立科学研究的底线,可以促进科学技术的进展,创造一个良好的学术环境,然后贡献建设健康与科学教育体系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号